ArticleCancer research2022
CIC-Mediated Modulation of MAPK Signaling Opposes Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Response in Kinase-Addicted Sarcoma.
Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- It's all downstream from here: RTK/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway resistance mechanisms in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- HER2 Antibody-Drug Conjugates Are Active against Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Therapeutic Targeting of High-Level ERBB2 Amplification in NSCLC.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2024Article
- Vepafestinib: a RET-selective inhibitor with enhanced CNS penetrance targets therapy-resistant mutants.Nature cancer · 2023Article
- Vepafestinib is a pharmacologically advanced RET-selective inhibitor with high CNS penetration and inhibitory activity against RET solvent front mutations.Nature cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Kinase fusions have been identified in a growing subset of sarcomas, but a lack of preclinical models has impeded their functional analysis as therapeutic targets in the sarcoma setting. In this study, we generated models of sarcomas bearing kinase fusions and assessed their response to molecularly targeted therapy. Immortalized, untransformed human mesenchymal stem cells (HMSC), a putative cell of origin of sarcomas, were modified using CRISPR-Cas9 to harbor a RET chromosomal translocation (HMSC-RET). In parallel, patient-derived models of RET- and NTRK-rearranged sarcomas were generated. Expression of a RET fusion activated common proliferation and survival pathways and transformed HMSC cells. The HMSC-RET models displayed similar behavior and response to therapy as the patient-derived counterparts in vitro and in vivo. Capicua (CIC)-mediated suppression of negative MAPK pathway regulators was identified as a potential mechanism by which these sarcomas compensate for RET or NTRK inhibition. This CIC-mediated feedback reactivation was blocked by coinhibition of the MAPK pathway and RET or NTRK in the respective models. Importantly, the combination of RET and ERK inhibitors was more effective than single agents at blocking tumor growth in vivo. This work offers new tools and insights to improve targeted therapy approaches in kinase-addicted sarcomas and supports upfront combination therapy to prolong responses. SIGNIFICANCE: Novel models of kinase-rearranged sarcomas show that MAPK pathway feedback activation dampens responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, revealing the potential of combinatorial therapies to combat these tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.