Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074712›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology review2022

A meta-analysis of associations between weight bias internalization and conceptually-related correlates: A step towards improving construct validity.

Kelly A Romano, Kristin E Heron, Cassidy M Sandoval, Lindsay M Howard, Rachel I MacIntyre, Tyler B Mason

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A randomized controlled trial of an acceptance and commitment therapy-informed diabetes prevention program reduces body shame and distress.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visible yet Invisible: embodied meanings of weight stigma among women with binge eating disorder and higher weight.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelly A RomanoThe Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA. Electronic address: kroma001@odu.edu.
Kristin E HeronThe Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA; Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Cassidy M SandovalThe Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Lindsay M HowardDepartment of Psychology, Augustana University, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Rachel I MacIntyreDepartment of Psychology, Millersville University, Millersville, PA, USA.
Tyler B MasonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Biobehavioral Effects of Inhibitory Control on Eating and Diet Behaviors Among AdolescentsK01DK124435 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MASON, TYLER · 2020 to 2024
$736k
Affect, Mind-Body Factors, and Eating Behaviors: Examining Naturalistic Associations among Female Young Adults with Eating Disorder SymptomsF31MH120982 · NIMH · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI ROMANO, KELLY A. · 2020 to 2021
$67k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK124435NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH120982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight bias internalization (WBI), a process of weight-based self-devaluation, has been associated with adverse mental and physical health. However, there are limitations with the existing conceptualization and operationalization of WBI that raise questions about the implications of this evidence-base. To address these limitations, the present study investigated the construct validity of WBI by conducting a meta-analysis of associations between WBI (as currently operationalized) and conceptually-related correlates. Studies identified through October 2021 that provided zero-order correlations for associations between WBI and conceptually-related constructs were examined. Meta-regression determined whether these associations differed across WBI measures and demographic (age, sex/gender, race, BMI) and study-level (publication status, sample type, study quality) moderators. Data for 128 (sub)samples were identified (Msample size = 477.83, SD = 1679.90; Mage = 34.46, SD = 12.17; range = 10.21-56.60). Greater WBI exhibited large to very large associations with factors suggested to have considerable overlap with this construct (negative and positive body image, self-devaluation), general and weight-specific experiential avoidance, and individuals' anticipation of future weight stigma. Associations varied for other constructs that have been differentially included in conceptualizations of WBI (endorsing weight bias, weight stigma stereotype awareness, weight stigma experiences), and via measurement-related, demographic, and study-level factors. These findings provide important information that can advance WBI conceptualization and measure-refinement.

Indexed as

Weight PrejudiceBody WeightHumansObesitySelf ConceptSocial StigmaObesityPsychological methodsWeight bias internalizationWeight stigma

Identifiers

PMID35074712
PMCPMC8858873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.