Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074387›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

The impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on wildlife in Deccan Plateau, India.

Asit K Behera, P Ramesh Kumar, M Malathi Priya, T Ramesh, Riddhika Kalle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asit K BeheraSálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India; Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
P Ramesh KumarDeputy Conservator of Forest, Bannerghatta National Park, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M Malathi PriyaDeputy Conservator of Forest, Bengaluru Rural Forest Division, Karnataka, India.
T RameshSálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India; Centre for Functional Biodiversity, University of KwaZulu- Natal, South Africa. Electronic address: ramesh81ngl@gmail.com.
Riddhika KalleSálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India; Centre for Functional Biodiversity, University of KwaZulu- Natal, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented changes in human activity via extensive lockdowns worldwide. Large-scale shifts in human activities bestowed both positive and negative impacts on wildlife. Unforeseen reduction in the activities of people allowed wildlife to venture outside of forested areas to exploit newfound habitats and increase their diurnal activities. While on a negative note, a reduction in forest-related law enforcement led to substantial increase in illegal activities such as poaching. We conducted mammal surveys in forested and nearby farmland of a fragmented landscape under two distinct scenarios: pre-lockdown and lockdown. An increase in poaching activities observed during the lockdown period in our study area provided us an opportunity to investigate the impact of the lockdown on wildlife. Camera trapping data of four highly poached mammalian species, namely black-naped hare Lepus nigricollis, wild pig Sus scrofa, four-horned antelope Tetracerus quadricornis and leopard Panthera pardus were considered to investigate activity patterns and habitat use, to understand the effect of lockdown. The pre-lockdown period was used as a baseline to compare any changes in trends of activity patterns, habitat use and detection probabilities of targeted species. Species-specific changes in activity patterns of study species were observed, with an increment in daytime activity during lockdown. The results showed species-specific increase in the habitat use of study species during lockdown. Reduction in the detection probability of all study species was witnessed. This is the first study to highlight the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on the responses of wildlife by considering the changes in their temporal and spatial use before and during lockdown. The knowledge gained on wildlife during reduced human mobility because of the pandemic aid in understanding the effect of human disturbances and developing future conservation strategies in the shared space, to manage both wildlife and humans.

Indexed as

Animals, WildCOVID-19AnimalsCommunicable Disease ControlEcosystemHumansIndiaMammalsPandemicsActivity patternCamera trapCOVID-19DetectionLockdownOccupancyWildlife

Identifiers

PMID35074387
PMCPMC8782731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.