Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074315›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2022

A sensitive and less cytotoxic assay for identification of proliferating T cells based on bioorthogonally-functionalized uridine analogue.

F C Stempels, A S de Wit, M S Swierstra, S Maassen, F Bianchi, G van den Bogaart, M V Baranov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review of in vitro approaches for assessing the toxicity of chemical stressors across diverse physiological systems.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F C StempelsDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
A S de WitDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
M S SwierstraDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
S MaassenDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
F BianchiDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
G van den BogaartDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: G.van.den.Bogaart@rug.nl.
M V BaranovDepartment of Molecular Immunology and Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

European Research Council 862137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative detection of T cell proliferation is an important readout in immunology research, as it is one of the hallmarks of T cell activation. Fluorescence-based methods for T cell proliferation mostly rely on the usage of probes that non-specifically conjugate to free primary amine groups in cells. Each cell division then results in a two-fold dilution of the probes which is detectable with flow cytometry. However, questions have been raised about cytotoxicity of these dilution-based T cell proliferation probes and they potentially affect T cell activation. An alternative assay relies on the incorporation of the uridine analog BrdU in the DNA of dividing T cells that can be detected with an antibody, but this requires harsh fixation and denaturation conditions. Recently, a new assay for detection of cell proliferation has been developed, based on the incorporation of the bioorthogonally-functionalized uridine analog 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU). Goal of this study was to compare the sensitivity and cytotoxicity of the EdU assay with a widely-used dilution-based T cell proliferation probe, CellTrace Far Red. We found that, compared to the dilution-based probe, the EdU-based assay better preserves T cell viability, is more sensitive for detecting T cell proliferation, and allows for better discernable interferon gamma responses.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDeoxyuridineBromodeoxyuridineCell ProliferationFlow CytometryStaining and LabelingT-LymphocytesUridineAntineoplastic AgentsBromodeoxyuridineDeoxyuridineUridineDilution-based probeEdUEthynyl-uridineT cell activationT cell proliferation

Identifiers

PMID35074315
PMCPMC7614694
OpenAlexW4210773495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.