Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35074211›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2022

Waving Through the Window: A Model of Volitional Social Interaction in Female Mice.

Leslie A Ramsey, Fernanda M Holloman, Bruce T Hope, Yavin Shaham, Marco Venniro

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A rat model of volitional mutual social interactions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie A RamseyBehavioral Neuroscience Branch Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: Leslie.ramsey@nih.gov.
Fernanda M HollomanBehavioral Neuroscience Branch Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Bruce T HopeBehavioral Neuroscience Branch Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yavin ShahamBehavioral Neuroscience Branch Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Marco VenniroDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: Marco.venniro@som.umaryland.edu.
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Characterization of neuronal ensembles activated during drug-induced behaviorZIADA000467 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI HOPE, BRUCE · 2009 to 2025
$35.8M
The protective effect of volitional social interaction on drug addictionR00DA047976 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI VENNIRO, MARCO · 2021 to 2023
$747k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA047976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMouse models of social behavior fail to account for volitional aspects of social interaction, and current neurobiological investigation of social behavior is performed almost exclusively using C57BL/6J mice, the background strain of most transgenic mice. Here, we introduce a mouse model of operant social self-administration and choice, using a custom-made apparatus.

methodsFirst, we trained adolescent and adult female C57BL/6J and CD1 mice to self-administer palatable food pellets and then to lever press under increasing fixed-ratio response requirements for access to an age-matched female social partner. Next, we tested their motivation to seek social interaction using a progressive ratio reinforcement schedule, relapse to social seeking after social isolation, and choice between palatable food versus social interaction. We also tested social conditioned place preference in adult female CD1 and C57BL/6J mice.

resultsAdolescent and adult female mice of both strains showed similar rates of food self-administration. In contrast, CD1 mice demonstrated significantly stronger social self-administration than C57BL/6J mice under both reinforcement schedules. CD1 but not C57BL/6J mice demonstrated robust social seeking after social isolation. In the choice task, CD1 mice preferred social interaction, whereas C57BL/6J mice preferred food. CD1 but not C57BL/6J mice demonstrated robust social conditioned place preference. The strain differences were age independent.

conclusionsOur data show that CD1 mice are a better strain for studying female social reward learning. Our mouse operant social model provides a tool for research on neurobiological substrates of female social reward and disruption of social reward in psychiatric disorders using mouse-specific genetic tools.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorSocial InteractionAdolescentAnimalsConditioning, OperantDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReinforcement ScheduleRewardAdolescenceAnimal modelsConditioned place preferenceMiceOperant behaviorSocial reward

Identifiers

PMID35074211
PMCPMC9081292
OpenAlexW3214355293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.