Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073985›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Protocol of a pilot-scale, single-arm, observational study to assess the utility and acceptability of a wearable hydration monitor in haemodialysis patients.

Vicki Sandys, Colin Edwards, Paul McAleese, Emer O'Hare, Conall O'Seaghdha

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04623281 (Haemodialysis Outcomes & Patient Empowerment Study 02), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04623281 completednot on this map

Haemodialysis Outcomes & Patient Empowerment Study 02

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal College of Surgeons, IrelandRan2021 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsEnd Stage Renal Disease, Dialysis, Complications, Volume OverloadArmsSixty device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vicki SandysRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. vickisandys20@rcsi.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-5346
Colin EdwardspatientMpower Ltd., 21 Denzille Lane, Dublin, D02 EY19, Ireland.
Paul McAleeseDesign to Value Ltd., Innishannon, Co., Cork, Ireland.
Emer O'HareRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Conall O'SeaghdhaRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

Enterprise Ireland DT 2019 0086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid overload has a high prevalence in haemodialysis patients and is an important risk factor for excess mortality and hospitalisations. Despite the risks associated with chronic fluid overload, it is clinically difficult to assess and maintain fluid status adequately. Current methods of fluid status assessment are either imprecise or time intensive. In particular, to date, no method exists to accurately assess fluid status during the interdialytic interval.

objectivesThis pilot study aimed to evaluate whether a prototype wearable hydration monitor can accurately and reproducibly detect fluid overload in the haemodialysis population when compared to haemodialysis and bioimpedance data.

methodsA prospective, open-label, single-arm observational trial of 20 patients commenced in January 2021 in a single haemodialysis centre in Ireland, with a wearable hydration monitor, the Sixty device. The Sixty device uses diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to measure fluid levels at the level of the subdermis and uses machine learning to develop an algorithm that can determine fluid status. The Sixty device was worn at every dialysis session and nocturnally over a three-week observational period. Haemodialysis parameters including interdialytic weight gain, ultrafiltration volume, blood pressure, and relative blood volume were collected from each session, and bioimpedance measurements using the Fresenius body composition monitor were performed on 4 occasions as a comparator. The primary objective of this trial was to determine the accuracy and reproducibility of the Sixty device compared to bioimpedance measurements.

conclusionIf the accuracy of the wearable hydration monitor is validated, further studies will be conducted to integrate the device output into a multi-parameter machine learning algorithm that can provide patients with actionable insights to manage fluid overload in the interdialytic period.

trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov NCT04623281 . Registered November 10th, 2020.

Identifiers

PMID35073985
PMCPMC8785447
OpenAlexW4207036135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.