Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073941›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

sPLINK: a hybrid federated tool as a robust alternative to meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies.

Reza Nasirigerdeh, Reihaneh Torkzadehmahani, Julian Matschinske, Tobias Frisch, Markus List, Julian Späth, Stefan Weiss, Uwe Völker, Esa Pitkänen, Dominik Heider and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. AI in microbiome-related healthcare.Microbial biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ensuring Trust in Genomics Research.... IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications : (TPS-ISA ...). IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Reza NasirigerdehAI in Medicine and Healthcare, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. reza.nasirigerdeh@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2283-5792
Reihaneh TorkzadehmahaniAI in Medicine and Healthcare, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julian MatschinskeChair of Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias FrischDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Markus ListChair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julian SpäthChair of Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan WeissDepartment of Functional Genomics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Uwe VölkerDepartment of Functional Genomics, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Esa PitkänenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Dominik HeiderDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Nina Kerstin WenkeChair of Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Georgios KaissisAI in Medicine and Healthcare, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel RueckertAI in Medicine and Healthcare, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tim KacprowskiDivision Data Science in Biomedicine, Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Brunswick, Germany.
Jan Baumbach *Chair of Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meta-analysis has been established as an effective approach to combining summary statistics of several genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, the accuracy of meta-analysis can be attenuated in the presence of cross-study heterogeneity. We present sPLINK, a hybrid federated and user-friendly tool, which performs privacy-aware GWAS on distributed datasets while preserving the accuracy of the results. sPLINK is robust against heterogeneous distributions of data across cohorts while meta-analysis considerably loses accuracy in such scenarios. sPLINK achieves practical runtime and acceptable network usage for chi-square and linear/logistic regression tests. sPLINK is available at https://exbio.wzw.tum.de/splink .

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPrivacyLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMeta-Analysis as TopicFederated learningGenome-wide association studiesGWASMeta-analysisPLINKPrivacysPLINK

Identifiers

PMID35073941
PMCPMC8785575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.