Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073940›Full record

SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for treatment with locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Haoyan Wu, Chuanwen Fan, Chao Fang, Libin Huang, Yuan Li, Zongguang Zhou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05496491 (Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05496491 narecruitingnot on this map

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLarissa University HospitalRan2022 to 2029Enrolled84ConditionsRectal NeoplasmsArmsNeoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant Chemotherapy, Consolidation Chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Haoyan Wu *Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Chuanwen Fan *Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Chao Fang *Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Libin HuangLaboratory of Digestive Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yuan LiLaboratory of Digestive Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Zongguang ZhouLaboratory of Digestive Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. zhou767@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-1199
Sichuan University · CNLinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe addition of consolidation chemotherapy to preoperative short-course radiotherapy during the prolonged interval between the completion of radiation and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) could enhance pathologic response and might act on potential micrometastasis. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate whether short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy (SCRT/CCT) could be a neoadjuvant treatment option compared with conventional long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT).

methodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary endpoints were pathological outcomes, and the secondary endpoints included survival rate, sphincter preservation rate, R0 resection rate and toxicity. RevMan 5.3 was used to calculate pooled risk ratio (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsA total of seven eligible studies and 1865 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the LCCRT, SCRT/CCT increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rate [RR = 1.74, 95% CI (1.41, 2.15), P < 0.01] and led to a lower proportion of patients with adjuvant pathologic tumor stage 3-4 (ypT3-4) disease [RR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.80, 0.97), P = 0.01] or lymph node positive (ypN +) disease [RR = 0.83, 95% CI (0.71, 0.98), P = 0.02]. In addition, the disease-free survival (DFS) was better in SCRT/CCT group [RR = 1.10, 95% CI (1.02, 1.18), P = 0.01], while overall survival rate and toxicity and surgical procedures were similar between two groups.

conclusionBased on better pathological outcomes and DFS in SCRT/CCT group, we recommended preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy as the optional neoadjuvant treatment for LARC.

Indexed as

Consolidation ChemotherapyCombined Modality TherapyHumansNeoplasm StagingPreoperative PeriodRadiotherapyRectal NeoplasmsTime FactorsConsolidation chemotherapyMeta-analysisRectal cancerShort-course radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35073940
PMCPMC8785003
OpenAlexW4207078212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.