Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073873›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2022

Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient's perspective.

Mohd Syafiq Ismail, Greg Murphy, S Semenov, D McNamara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advances in colon capsule endoscopy: a review of current applications and challenges.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Patient experiences of colon capsule endoscopy: a qualitative study.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohd Syafiq Ismail *Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. syafiqismail2009@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4461-136X
Greg Murphy *Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
S SemenovDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
D McNamaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IETallaght University Hospital · IETrinity College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) has proven efficacy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes and preference between colonoscopy and CCE.

methodsPatients from our centre who had both a CCE and colonoscopy within a 12-month period were identified. We performed over-the-phone interviews focused on satisfaction, comfort, and overall preference with a 10-point Likert scale. Electronic records were reviewed; reported Modified-Gloucester-Comfort-Scale (GCS) score, sedation, bowel preparation and endoscopist grade were documented. Data was compared between procedures. A Fishers exact test was used to compare proportions and a Student t-test was used to compare means, a p < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsIn all, 40 patients were identified, 57.5% (23/40) were female and the mean age was 48 years (24-78). All patients were referred for investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms as part of an ongoing study [Endosc Int Open. 2021;09(06):E965-70]. There was a significance difference in mean comfort (9.2 vs 6.7, p < 0.0001, 95% CI - 3.51 to - 1.44) but not satisfaction (8.3 vs 7.7, p = 0.2, 95% CI - 1.48 to 0.33) between CCE and colonoscopy. Main cause of dissatisfaction with CCE was bowel preparation and for colonoscopy was discomfort. Age and gender were not found to be variables. The correlation between GCS and patient reported values was weak (R = - 0.28). Overall, 77.5% (31/40) of patients would prefer a CCE if they required further bowel investigation. Of these, 77.4% (24/31) preferred a CCE despite the potential need for follow-up colonoscopy.

conclusionsCCE has a high satisfaction rating (8.3 vs 7.7) and has a higher patient reported comfort rating (9.2 vs 6.7) than colonoscopy. Studies have confirmed CCE and colonoscopy have equivalent diagnostic yields. The majority of patients in our cohort prefer CCE to colonoscopy. CCE should be considered as an alternative to colonoscopy in selected individuals.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCohort StudiesColonoscopyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedColon Capsule EndoscopyColonoscopyComfortPatient preference

Identifiers

PMID35073873
PMCPMC8785487
OpenAlexW4210816332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.