Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073861›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

A qualitative exploratory interview study on birth companion support actions for women during childbirth.

Eva Wodeya Wanyenze, Josaphat K Byamugisha, Nazarius Mboona Tumwesigye, Patience A Muwanguzi, Gorrette K Nalwadda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Introducing Birth Companion in Labour: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eva Wodeya WanyenzeDepartment of Nursing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda. ewanyenze@must.ac.ug.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-2215
Josaphat K ByamugishaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Nazarius Mboona TumwesigyeSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Patience A MuwanguziDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Gorrette K NalwaddaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGMbarara University of Science and Technology · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization recommends that women are supported continuously throughout labor by a companion of their choice. And, that companions have clearly designated roles and responsibilities to ensure that their presence is beneficial to both the woman and her health care providers. Presently, there is lack of strong evidence regarding specific support actions in relation to women's needs of care. Thus, we aimed to explore birth companion support actions for women during childbirth.

methodsThis was an exploratory descriptive qualitative study conducted between August 2019 and December 2019; at a referral hospital in the Eastern part of Uganda. Ten women were purposively selected: those who were admitted in early labor, expecting a normal delivery, and had fulltime birth companion. Nonparticipant direct observation and in-depth interviews were used to collect data. Latent content analysis was used.

resultsThree themes were identified: "Support actions aiding a good childbirth experience", "Support actions hindering coping with labor", and "Women's needs and expectations of care". Support actions aiding a good experience described were; emotional presence, motivation, providing nourishments, messenger activities, body massage for pain relief, assisting in ambulation and coaching. Companion fearful behaviors and disrespectful care in form of unacknowledged needs and hostility from birth companions were reported to hinder coping. The women desired thoughtful communication, trust, for birth companions to anticipate their needs and recognize non perceptive phases of labor to allow them focus on themselves.

conclusionBirth companions from this study largely supported women emotionally, and attended to their physical needs. The greater part of support actions provided were esteemed by the women. Presence of birth companion will be of benefit when individual needs of women are put into consideration. Also, more guidance for birth companions is necessary to boost their role and mitigate shortcomings of their presence during childbirth.

Indexed as

CaregiversFriendsQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricParturitionPregnancyQualitative ResearchUgandaYoung AdultBirthBirth companionContinuous supportLaborUganda

Identifiers

PMID35073861
PMCPMC8785438
OpenAlexW4206898847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.