ArticlePhysiotherapy theory and practice2023
Clinical utility of the Trendelenburg Test in people with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Physiotherapy theory and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical utility of the Trendelenburg Test remains unknown in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
objectiveTo measure (1) intra-rater reliability, (2) agreement of goniometer-assessed Trendelenburg pelvis-on-femur angle (POF) with motion capture, and (3) concurrent validity of Trendelenburg POF and hip abduction strength with POF during walking and step negotiation.
methodsTrendelenburg POF was measured in 20 people with MS using goniometry and motion analysis. In addition, peak POF was measured using motion analysis during walking, step ascent, and step descent. Intra-rater reliability of goniometer-assessed Trendelenburg POF and agreement with motion analysis-assessed POF were analyzed. Pearson's
resultsGoniometer-assessed Trendelenburg POF demonstrated very strong reliability (ICC: 0.948), strong agreement with 3D motion analysis (ICC: 0.792), correlated moderately with peak POF during walking (
conclusionsGoniometer-assessed Trendelenburg POF was reliable, agreed with motion analysis, and may provide insight into hip abduction muscle performance during functional activities in people with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.