Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073573›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2022

TP53 mutation defines a unique subgroup within complex karyotype de novo and therapy-related MDS/AML.

Olga K Weinberg, Alexa Siddon, Yazan F Madanat, Jeffrey Gagan, Daniel A Arber, Paola Dal Cin, Damodaran Narayanan, Madhu M Ouseph, Jason H Kurzer, Robert P Hasserjian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatment ofHaematologica · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olga K WeinbergDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Alexa SiddonDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Yazan F MadanatDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-9573-2690
Jeffrey GaganDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-4676-9969
Daniel A ArberDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-2160-9689
Paola Dal CinDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Damodaran NarayananDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Madhu M OusephDepartment of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3422-1675
Jason H KurzerDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA; and.
Robert P HasserjianDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A subset of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) show complex karyotype (CK), and these cases include a relatively high proportion of cases of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms and TP53 mutations. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of outcome of 299 AML and MDS patients with CK collected from multiple academic institutions. Mutations were present in 287 patients (96%), and the most common mutation detected was in TP53 gene (247, 83%). A higher frequency of TP53 mutations was present in therapy-related cases (P = .008), with a trend for worse overall survival (OS) in therapy-related patients as compared with de novo disease (P = .08) and within the therapy-related group; the presence of TP53 mutation strongly predicted for worse outcome (P = .0017). However, there was no difference in survival between CK patients based on categorization of AML vs MDS (P = .96) or presence of absence of circulating blasts ≥1% (P = .52). TP53-mutated patients presented with older age (P = .06) and lower hemoglobin levels (P = .004) and marrow blast counts (P = .02) compared with those with CK lacking TP53 mutation. Multivariable analysis identified presence of multihit TP53 mutation as strongest predictor of worse outcome, whereas neither a diagnosis of AML vs MDS nor therapy-relatedness independently influenced OS. Our findings suggest that among patients with MDS and AML, the presence of TP53 mutation (in particular multihit TP53 mutation) in the context of CK identifies a homogeneously aggressive disease, irrespective of the blast count at presentation or therapy-relatedness. The current classification of these cases into different disease categories artificially separates a single biologic disease entity.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyelodysplastic SyndromesNeoplasms, Second PrimaryHumansKaryotypeMutationPrognosisTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID35073573
PMCPMC9092405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.