Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073448›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

Gene drives for vertebrate pest control: Realistic spatial modelling of eradication probabilities and times for island mouse populations.

Aysegul Birand, Phillip Cassey, Joshua V Ross, James C Russell, Paul Thomas, Thomas A A Prowse

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Y-linked editors for invasive rodent control.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Leveraging a natural murine meiotic drive to suppress invasive populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. eLife · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aysegul BirandInvasion Science and Wildlife Ecology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-3627
Phillip CasseyInvasion Science and Wildlife Ecology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Joshua V RossSchool of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
James C RussellSchool of Biological Sciences and the Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Paul ThomasSchool of Medicine and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Thomas A A ProwseInvasion Science and Wildlife Ecology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive alien species continue to threaten global biodiversity. CRISPR-based gene drives, which can theoretically spread through populations despite imparting a fitness cost, could be used to suppress or eradicate pest populations. We develop an individual-based, spatially explicit, stochastic model to simulate the ability of CRISPR-based homing and X chromosome shredding drives to eradicate populations of invasive house mice (Mus muculus) from islands. Using the model, we explore the interactive effect of the efficiency of the drive constructs and the spatial ecology of the target population on the outcome of a gene-drive release. We also consider the impact of polyandrous mating and sperm competition, which could compromise the efficacy of some gene-drive strategies. Our results show that both drive strategies could be used to eradicate large populations of mice. Whereas parameters related to drive efficiency and demography strongly influence drive performance, we find that sperm competition following polyandrous mating is unlikely to impact the outcome of an eradication effort substantially. Assumptions regarding the spatial ecology of mice influenced the probability of and time required for eradication, with short-range dispersal capacities and limited mate-search areas producing 'chase' dynamics across the island characterized by cycles of local extinction and recolonization by mice. We also show that highly efficient drives are not always optimal, when dispersal and mate-search capabilities are low. Rapid local population suppression around the introduction sites can cause loss of the gene drive before it can spread to the entire island. We conclude that, although the design of efficient gene drives is undoubtedly critical, accurate data on the spatial ecology of target species are critical for predicting the result of a gene-drive release.

Indexed as

Gene Drive TechnologyAnimalsBiodiversityIntroduced SpeciesMiceProbabilityVertebratesCRISPRhoming driveIsland conservationpest eradicationspatial modelX-shredder

Identifiers

PMID35073448
PMCPMC9303646
OpenAlexW4206945414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.