Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073157›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2022

Risk for Reinfection After SARS-CoV-2: A Living, Rapid Review for American College of Physicians Practice Points on the Role of the Antibody Response in Conferring Immunity Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Mark Helfand, Celia Fiordalisi, Jack Wiedrick, Katrina L Ramsey, Charlotte Armstrong, Emily Gean, Kara Winchell, Irina Arkhipova-Jenkins

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Incidence of and risk factors for suspected COVID-19 reinfection in Kyoto City: a population-based epidemiological study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of COVID-19 in Older Adults.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Living, Rapid Reviews in a Rapidly Evolving World.Annals of internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark HelfandScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon (M.H., C.F., C.A., E.G., K.W., I.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-4846-9900
Celia FiordalisiScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon (M.H., C.F., C.A., E.G., K.W., I.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-5610-1925
Jack WiedrickBiostatistics & Design Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (J.W., K.L.R.).
Katrina L RamseyBiostatistics & Design Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (J.W., K.L.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-3958-0087
Charlotte ArmstrongScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon (M.H., C.F., C.A., E.G., K.W., I.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-7918-5228
Emily GeanScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon (M.H., C.F., C.A., E.G., K.W., I.A.).
Kara WinchellScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon (M.H., C.F., C.A., E.G., K.W., I.A.).
Irina Arkhipova-JenkinsScientific Resource Center for the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program, Portland VA Research Foundation, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon (M.H., C.F., C.A., E.G., K.W., I.A.).
Portland VA Research Foundation · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe strength and duration of immunity from infection with SARS-CoV-2 are important for public health planning and clinical practice. PURPOSE: To synthesize evidence on protection against reinfection after SARS-CoV-2 infection. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), the World Health Organization global literature database, ClinicalTrials.gov, COVID19reviews.org, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Longitudinal studies that compared the risk for reinfection after SARS-CoV-2 infection versus infection risk in individuals with no prior infection. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators sequentially extracted study data and rated quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Across 18 eligible studies, reinfection risk ranged from 0% to 2.2%. In persons with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with unvaccinated, previously uninfected individuals, 80% to 98% of symptomatic infections with wild-type or Alpha variants were prevented (high strength of evidence). In the meta-analysis, previous infection reduced risk for reinfection by 87% (95% CI, 84% to 90%), equaling 4.3 fewer infections per 100 persons in both the general population (risk difference, -0.043 [CI, -0.071 to -0.015]) and health care workers (risk difference, -0.043 [CI, -0.069 to -0.016]), and 26.6 fewer infections per 100 persons in care facilities (risk difference, -0.266 [CI, -0.449 to -0.083]). Protection remained above 80% for at least 7 months, but no study followed patients after the emergence of the Delta or Omicron variant. Results for the elderly were conflicting. LIMITATION: Methods to ascertain and diagnose infections varied.

conclusionBefore the emergence of the Delta and Omicron variants, persons with recent infection had strong protection against symptomatic reinfections for 7 months compared with unvaccinated, previously uninfected individuals. Protection in immunocompromised persons, racial and ethnic subgroups, and asymptomatic index case patients is unclear. The durability of protection in the setting of the Delta and Omicron variants is unknown. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42020207098).

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansAgedAntibody FormationHumansReinfectionSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID35073157
PMCPMC8791447
OpenAlexW4206976324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.