Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073141›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2022

Dynamic in-flight shifts of working memory resources across saccades.

Rob Udale, Moc Tram Tran, Sanjay Manohar, Masud Husain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rob UdaleDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-554X
Moc Tram TranDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0001-7507-7123
Sanjay ManoharDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0003-0735-4349
Masud HusainDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-9255

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V036858/1Wellcome Trust 206330/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how memory resources are allocated in natural vision across sequential eye movements and fixations, as people actively extract information from the visual environment. Here, we used gaze-contingent eye tracking to examine how such resources are dynamically reallocated from old to new information entering working memory. As participants looked sequentially at items, we interrupted the process at different times by extinguishing the display as a saccade was initiated. After a brief interval, participants were probed on one of the items that had been presented. Paradoxically, across all experiments, the final (unfixated) saccade target was recalled more precisely when more items had previously been fixated, that is, with longer rather than shorter saccade sequences. This result is difficult to explain on current models of working memory because recall error, even for the final item, is typically higher as memory load increases. The findings could however be accounted for by a model that describes how resources are dynamically reallocated on a moment-by-moment basis. During each saccade, the target is encoded by consuming a proportion of currently available resources from a limited working memory, as well as by reallocating resources away from previously encoded items. These findings reveal how working memory resources are shifted across memoranda in active vision. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermSaccadesEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansMental Recall

Identifiers

PMID35073141
PMCPMC8785606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.