Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35073127›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Applied2021

Risk perceptions and health behaviors as COVID-19 emerged in the United States: Results from a probability-based nationally representative sample.

Dana Rose Garfin, Baruch Fischhoff, E Alison Holman, Roxane Cohen Silver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. The role of perceived risk on dishonest decision making during a pandemic.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana Rose GarfinSue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California, Irvine.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-9307
Baruch FischhoffDepartment of Engineering and Public Policy, Institute for Politics and Strategy, Carnegie Mellon University.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-6874
E Alison HolmanSue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California, Irvine.ORCID 0000-0001-5076-8403
Roxane Cohen SilverProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine.ORCID 0000-0002-4013-6792

Funding

Mindfulness-intervention to Address PTSD in Trauma-exposed, Homeless WomenK01MD013910 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GARFIN, DANA ROSE · 2019 to 2023
$702k
National Science FoundationNIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD013910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding psychosocial correlates of engaging in health-protective behaviors during an infectious disease outbreak can inform targeted intervention strategies. We surveyed a national probability-based sample of 6,514 Americans, with three separate, consecutive representative cohorts between March 18, 2020 and April 18, 2020, as the U.S. COVID-19 epidemic began. Americans adopted many health-protective behaviors (e.g., hand hygiene, social distancing) early, performing them, on average, "most of the time," with frequency increasing over time. In covariate-adjusted models, self-reported female gender (β = .16, p < .001), older age (β = .13, p < .001), more COVID-related secondary stressors (β = .17, p < .001), and greater perceptions of the risks of catching (β = .07, p = .001) and dying (β = .09, p < .001) from Coronavirus were associated with greater frequency of social-distancing behaviors. Wearing face masks and/or gloves was positively associated with female gender (β = .07, p < .001), older age (β = .14, p < .001), Black (β = .14, p < .001) and Hispanic (β = .07, p = .002) ethnicity, personal-COVID-19 exposure (β = .06, p < .001), reporting secondary stressors (β = .11, p < .001), and higher perceived risk of dying from Coronavirus (β = .13, p < .001). Participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 (compared to Cohort 1) wore face masks and gloves and engaged in social distancing more frequently. Overall, early in the U.S. COVID-19 outbreak, despite the novelty and uncertainty, Americans were responsive to guidelines, adopting them early and following them frequently. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMasksProbabilitySARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID35073127
PMCPMC9707407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.