Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072942›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Validity of Estimating the Maximal Oxygen Consumption by Consumer Wearables: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Expert Statement of the INTERLIVE Network.

Pablo Molina-Garcia, Hannah L Notbohm, Moritz Schumann, Rob Argent, Megan Hetherington-Rauth, Julie Stang, Wilhelm Bloch, Sulin Cheng, Ulf Ekelund, Luis B Sardinha and 4 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. VOeLife · 2023
    Trial
  6. Accuracy of VOMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validity of V̇OEuropean journal of applied physiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AI-based prediction of VONPJ microgravity · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Key factors to prioritize when preparing for the Olympic Games.Journal of sport and health science · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pablo Molina-GarciaPROFITH (PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity) Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Carretera de Alfacar s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain. pablomolinag5@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-0997
Hannah L NotbohmInstitute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
Moritz SchumannInstitute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
Rob ArgentInsight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Megan Hetherington-RauthExercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universida de de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Julie StangDepartment of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Wilhelm BlochInstitute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
Sulin ChengInstitute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Luis B SardinhaExercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universida de de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Brian CaulfieldInsight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jan Christian BrøndDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research Unit for Exercise Epidemiology, Centre of Research in Childhood Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
Anders GrøntvedDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research Unit for Exercise Epidemiology, Centre of Research in Childhood Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
Francisco B OrtegaPROFITH (PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity) Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Carretera de Alfacar s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain. ortegaf@ugr.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnological advances have recently made possible the estimation of maximal oxygen consumption (VO

objectiveThe aim was to (1) quantitatively summarize previous studies investigating the validity of the VO

methodsFirst, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies validating the estimation of VO

resultsFourteen validation studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results revealed that wearables using resting condition information in their algorithms significantly overestimated VO

conclusionsOur meta-analysis suggests that the estimations of VO PROSPERO ID: CRD42021246192.

Indexed as

SportsWearable Electronic DevicesExerciseExercise TestHumansOxygen Consumption

Identifiers

PMID35072942
PMCPMC9213394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.