ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022
PCXMC cone beam computed tomography dosimetry investigations.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiation exposure of young patients with abdominal neuroblastoma from therapeutic and imaging procedures: a phantom study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Estimation of organ and effective doses of CBCT scans of radiotherapy using size-specific field of view (FOV): a Monte Carlo study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in image guided radiation therapy being amongst the most widely used imaging modalities, there has been an increasing interest in quantifying the concomitant dose and risk. Whilst there have been several studies on this topic, there remains a lack of standardisation and knowledge on dose variations and the impact of patient size. Recently, PCXMC (a Monte Carlo simulator) has been used to assess both the concomitant dose and dosimetric impact of patient size variations for CBCT. The scopes of these studies, however, have included only a limited range of imaging manufacturers, protocols, and patient sizes. An approach using PCXMC and MATLAB was developed to enable a generalised method for rapidly quantifying and formulating the concomitant dose as a function of patient size across numerous CBCT vendors and protocols. The method was investigated using the Varian on board imaging 1.6 default pelvis and pelvis spotlight protocols, for 94 adult and paediatric phantoms over 6 age groups with extensive height and mass variations. It was found that dose varies significantly with patient size, as much as doubling and halving the average for patients of lower and higher mass, respectively. These variations, however, can be formulated and accounted for using the method developed, across a wide range of patient sizes for all CBCT vendors and protocols. This will enable the development of a comprehensive catalogue to account for concomitant doses in almost any clinically relevant scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35072895What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.