Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072721›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of a Family Integrated Care Model With Paternal Mental Health Outcomes During Neonatal Hospitalization.

Nicole R van Veenendaal, Sophie R D van der Schoor, Birit F P Broekman, Femke de Groof, Henriette van Laerhoven, Maartje E N van den Heuvel, Judith J M Rijnhart, J Hans B van Goudoever, Anne A M W van Kempen

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Promoting bonding and secure attachment in the NICU to improve parent-infant mental health: recommendations for clinical practice.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole R van VeenendaalDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sophie R D van der SchoorDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Birit F P BroekmanDepartment of Psychiatry, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Femke de GroofDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, NoordWest ZiekenhuisGroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Henriette van LaerhovenDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maartje E N van den HeuvelDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Judith J M RijnhartDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Hans B van GoudoeverEmma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anne A M W van KempenDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
OLVG · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: During newborn hospitalization in the neonatal unit, fathers often feel anxious and excluded from their child's caregiving and decision-making. Few studies and interventions have focused on fathers' mental health and their participation in neonatal care. Objective: To study the association of a family integrated care (FICare) model (in single family rooms with complete couplet-care for the mother-newborn dyad) vs standard neonatal care (SNC) in open bay units with separate maternity care with mental health outcomes in fathers at hospital discharge of their preterm newborn and to study whether parent participation was a mediator of the association of the FICare model on outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted from May 2017 to January 2020 as part of the fAMily Integrated Care in the Neonatal Ward Study, at level-2 neonatal units in the Netherlands (1 using the FICare model and 2 control sites using SNC). Participants included fathers of preterm newborns admitted to participating units. Data analysis was performed from January to April 2021. Exposure: FICare model in single family rooms with complete couplet-care for the mother-newborn dyad during maternity and/or neonatal care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Paternal mental health was measured using the Parental Stress Scale: NICU, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Post-partum Bonding Questionnaire, Perceived (Maternal) Parenting Self-efficacy Scale, and satisfaction with care (EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care-Neonatology). Parent participation (CO-PARTNER tool) was assessed as a potential mediator of the association of the FICare model with outcomes with mediation analyses (prespecified). Results: Of 309 families included in the fAMily Integrated Care in the Neonatal Ward Study, 263 fathers (85%) agreed to participate; 126 fathers were enrolled in FICare and 137 were enrolled in SNC. In FICare, 89 fathers (71%; mean [SD] age, 35.1 [4.8] years) responded to questionnaires and were analyzed. In SNC, 93 fathers (68%; mean [SD] age, 36.4 [5.5] years) responded to questionnaires and were analyzed. Fathers in FICare experienced less stress (adjusted β, -10.02; 95% CI, -15.91 to -4.13; P = .001) and had higher participation scores (adjusted odds ratio, 3.424; 95% CI, 0.860 to 5.988; P = .009) compared with those in SNC. Participation mediated the beneficial association of the FICare model with fathers' depressive symptoms (indirect effect, -0.051; 95% CI, -0.133 to -0.003) and bonding with their newborns (indirect effect, -0.082; 95% CI, -0.177 to -0.015). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the FICare model is associated with decreased paternal stress at discharge and enables fathers to be present and participate more than SNC, thus improving paternal mental health. Supporting fathers to actively participate in all aspects of newborn care should be encouraged regardless of architectural design of the neonatal unit.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsAdultCohort StudiesFamily TherapyFathersFemaleHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleParentsPatient Education as TopicProfessional-Family RelationsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35072721
PMCPMC8787602
OpenAlexW4206898202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.