Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072632›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Psychometric Evaluation of a Fear of COVID-19 Scale in China: Cross-sectional Study.

Edmond P H Choi, Wenjie Duan, Daniel Y T Fong, Kris Y W Lok, Mandy Ho, Janet Y H Wong, Chia-Chin Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Edmond P H ChoiSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9062-3540
Wenjie DuanSocial and Public Administration School, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1251-3685
Daniel Y T FongSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7365-9146
Kris Y W LokSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3227-0799
Mandy HoSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4460-7969
Janet Y H WongSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-4577
Chia-Chin LinSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9551-0991
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKEast China University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the very beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, information about fear of COVID-19 was very limited in Chinese populations, and there was no standardized and validated scale to measure the fear associated with the pandemic.

objectiveThis cross-sectional study aimed to adapt and validate a fear scale to determine the levels of fear of COVID-19 among the general population in mainland China and Hong Kong.

methodsA web-based questionnaire platform was developed for data collection; the study instruments were an adapted version of the 8-item Breast Cancer Fear Scale ("Fear Scale") and the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire. The internal construct validity, convergent validity, known group validity, and reliability of the adapted Fear Scale were assessed, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the participants' fear levels.

resultsA total of 2822 study participants aged 18 years or older were included in the analysis. The reliability of the adapted scale was satisfactory, with a Cronbach α coefficient of .93. The item-total correlations corrected for overlap were >0.4, confirming their internal construct validity. Regarding convergent validity, a small-to-moderate correlation between the Fear Scale and the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores was found. Regarding known group validity, we found that the study participants who were recruited from Hong Kong had a higher level of fear than the study participants from mainland China. Older adults had a higher level of fear compared with younger adults. Furthermore, having hypertension, liver disease, heart disease, cancer, anxiety, and insomnia were associated with a higher fear level. The descriptive analysis found that more than 40% of the study participants reported that the thought of COVID-19 scared them. About one-third of the study participants reported that when they thought about COVID-19, they felt nervous, uneasy, and depressed.

conclusionsThe psychometric properties of the adapted Fear Scale are acceptable to measure the fear of COVID-19 among Chinese people. Our study stresses the need for more psychosocial support and care to help this population cope with their fears during the pandemic.

Indexed as

ChineseCOVID-19cross-sectionalfearinformationmental healthpsychometricreliabilityscalesupportvalidationvalidity

Identifiers

PMID35072632
PMCPMC8893716
OpenAlexW4205645283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.