Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072631›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Influential Factors of Early Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Registry-Based Study.

Po-Yuan Su, Yi-Chia Wei, Hao Luo, Chi-Hung Liu, Wen-Yi Huang, Kuan-Fu Chen, Ching-Po Lin, Hung-Yu Wei, Tsong-Hai Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Po-Yuan Su *Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-3966
Yi-Chia Wei *Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6085-3134
Hao LuoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1900-279X
Chi-Hung LiuDepartment of Neurology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-2096
Wen-Yi HuangDepartment of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-9234
Kuan-Fu ChenClinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center, Chung Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-9497
Ching-Po LinInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-8776
Hung-Yu Wei *Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3116-306X
Tsong-Hai Lee *Department of Neurology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3935-5963
Chang Gung University · TWNational Taiwan University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely and accurate outcome prediction plays a vital role in guiding clinical decisions on acute ischemic stroke. Early condition deterioration and severity after the acute stage are determinants for long-term outcomes. Therefore, predicting early outcomes is crucial in acute stroke management. However, interpreting the predictions and transforming them into clinically explainable concepts are as important as the predictions themselves.

objectiveThis work focused on machine learning model analysis in predicting the early outcomes of ischemic stroke and used model explanation skills in interpreting the results.

methodsAcute ischemic stroke patients registered on the Stroke Registry of the Chang Gung Healthcare System (SRICHS) in 2009 were enrolled for machine learning predictions of the two primary outcomes: modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge and in-hospital deterioration. We compared 4 machine learning models, namely support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and deep neural network (DNN), with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Further, 3 resampling methods, random under sampling (RUS), random over sampling, and the synthetic minority over-sampling technique, dealt with the imbalanced data. The models were explained based on the ranking of feature importance and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

resultsRF performed well in both outcomes (discharge mRS: mean AUC 0.829, SD 0.018; in-hospital deterioration: mean AUC 0.710, SD 0.023 on original data and 0.728, SD 0.036 on resampled data with RUS for imbalanced data). In addition, DNN outperformed other models in predicting in-hospital deterioration on data without resampling (mean AUC 0.732, SD 0.064). In general, resampling contributed to the limited improvement of model performance in predicting in-hospital deterioration using imbalanced data. The features obtained from the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), white blood cell differential counts, and age were the key features for predicting discharge mRS. In contrast, the NIHSS total score, initial blood pressure, having diabetes mellitus, and features from hemograms were the most important features in predicting in-hospital deterioration. The SHAP summary described the impacts of the feature values on each outcome prediction.

conclusionsMachine learning models are feasible in predicting early stroke outcomes. An enriched feature bank could improve model performance. Initial neurological levels and age determined the activity independence at hospital discharge. In addition, physiological and laboratory surveillance aided in predicting in-hospital deterioration. The use of the SHAP explanatory method successfully transformed machine learning predictions into clinically meaningful results.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokecerebrovascular diseaseearly outcomeexplanationmachine learningpredictionrandom forestSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

PMID35072631
PMCPMC8994144
OpenAlexW4206955470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.