ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Influential Factors of Early Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Registry-Based Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction and Management of Stroke Rehabilitation.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Clinical variables provide the main predictive signal for early in-hospital rehabilitation triage after small-artery occlusion stroke: development and internal validation of an interpretable model.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Modeling diarrhea in children under five in Somaliland: A machine learning analysis using SLDHS 2020 data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Prediction of the short-term prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke in patients with high treatment platelet reactivity using explainable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Claims-Based Machine Learning Classifier of Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- AI post-intervention operational and functional outcomes prediction in ischemic stroke patients using MRIs.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a successful aging prediction model for older adults in China based on health ecology theory.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Predicting stroke severity of patients using interpretable machine learning algorithms.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Explainable Machine Learning Models for Brain Diseases: Insights from a Systematic Review.Neurology international · 2024Review
- Identifying biomarkers related to motor function in chronic stroke: A fNIRS and TMS study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Approaches for Stroke Risk Prediction: Findings from the Suita Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Prediction of atrial fibrillation and stroke using machine learning models in UK Biobank.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Multitask Deep Learning for Joint Detection of Necrotizing Viral and Noninfectious Retinitis From Common Blood and Serology Test Data.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Machine learning is an effective method to predict the 3-month prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Broad Trends in Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
- XGBoost-Based Simple Three-Item Model Accurately Predicts Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Predictors of micronutrient deficiency among children aged 6-23 months in Ethiopia: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTimely and accurate outcome prediction plays a vital role in guiding clinical decisions on acute ischemic stroke. Early condition deterioration and severity after the acute stage are determinants for long-term outcomes. Therefore, predicting early outcomes is crucial in acute stroke management. However, interpreting the predictions and transforming them into clinically explainable concepts are as important as the predictions themselves.
objectiveThis work focused on machine learning model analysis in predicting the early outcomes of ischemic stroke and used model explanation skills in interpreting the results.
methodsAcute ischemic stroke patients registered on the Stroke Registry of the Chang Gung Healthcare System (SRICHS) in 2009 were enrolled for machine learning predictions of the two primary outcomes: modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge and in-hospital deterioration. We compared 4 machine learning models, namely support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and deep neural network (DNN), with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Further, 3 resampling methods, random under sampling (RUS), random over sampling, and the synthetic minority over-sampling technique, dealt with the imbalanced data. The models were explained based on the ranking of feature importance and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsRF performed well in both outcomes (discharge mRS: mean AUC 0.829, SD 0.018; in-hospital deterioration: mean AUC 0.710, SD 0.023 on original data and 0.728, SD 0.036 on resampled data with RUS for imbalanced data). In addition, DNN outperformed other models in predicting in-hospital deterioration on data without resampling (mean AUC 0.732, SD 0.064). In general, resampling contributed to the limited improvement of model performance in predicting in-hospital deterioration using imbalanced data. The features obtained from the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), white blood cell differential counts, and age were the key features for predicting discharge mRS. In contrast, the NIHSS total score, initial blood pressure, having diabetes mellitus, and features from hemograms were the most important features in predicting in-hospital deterioration. The SHAP summary described the impacts of the feature values on each outcome prediction.
conclusionsMachine learning models are feasible in predicting early stroke outcomes. An enriched feature bank could improve model performance. Initial neurological levels and age determined the activity independence at hospital discharge. In addition, physiological and laboratory surveillance aided in predicting in-hospital deterioration. The use of the SHAP explanatory method successfully transformed machine learning predictions into clinically meaningful results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.