Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072548›Full record

Observational studyJournal of intensive care medicine2022

Patients Surviving Critical COVID-19 have Impairments in Dual-task Performance Related to Post-intensive Care Syndrome.

Nathan Morelli, Selina M Parry, Angela Steele, Megan Lusby, Ashley A Montgomery-Yates, Peter E Morris, Kirby P Mayer

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan MorelliCongdon School of Health Sciences, 3888High Point University, High Point, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9905-9736
Selina M ParryDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2204-3143
Angela SteelePulmonary Rehabilitation Center, Therapeutic Services, 12252University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Megan LusbyPulmonary Rehabilitation Center, Therapeutic Services, 12252University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Ashley A Montgomery-YatesDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, 4530University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Peter E MorrisDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, 4530University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Kirby P MayerDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, 4530University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3844-3846

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose was to examine Dual Task (DT) performance in patients surviving severe and critical COVID-19 compared to patients with chronic lung disease (CLD). Secondarily, we aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test in patients surviving COVID-19.

designProspective, cross-sectional, observational study.

settingAcademic medical center within United States. PATIENTS: Ninety-two patients including 36 survivors of critical COVID-19 that required mechanical ventilation (critical-COVID), 20 patients recovering from COVID-19 that required supplemental oxygen with hospitalization (severe-COVID), and 36 patients with CLD serving as a control group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPatients completed the TUG, DT-TUG, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) 1-month after hospital discharge. A subset of patients returned at 3-months and repeated testing to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC). Critical-COVID group (16.8 ± 7.3) performed the DT-TUG in significantly slower than CLD group (13.9 ± 4.8 s;

conclusionThe ability to maintain mobility performance in the presence of a cognitive DT is grossly impaired in patients surviving critical COVID-19. DT performance may subserve the understanding of impairments related to Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) for survivors of critical illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Task Performance and AnalysisCritical IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesGaitHumansProspective StudiesCOVID-19intensive caremobilityphysical functionpost intensive care syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35072548
PMCPMC9160440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.