Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072396›Full record

Observational studyBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2022

In-Hospital Outcomes of Right Minithoracotomy vs. Periareolar Access for Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair.

Karen Amanda Soares de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Dos Santos Lousa, Marcos Loiola de Souza, Tércio Campos Leão, Jeffchandler Belém de Oliveira, Lucas Henrique Prado Sousa, Arlindo Rodrigues Galvão, Rodrigo Oliveira Rosa Ribeiro de Souza

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen Amanda Soares de OliveiraFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8053-3074
Ana Carolina Dos Santos LousaFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Marcos Loiola de SouzaFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Tércio Campos LeãoCardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Ruy Azeredo, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Jeffchandler Belém de OliveiraCardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Ruy Azeredo, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Lucas Henrique Prado SousaCardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Ruy Azeredo, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Arlindo Rodrigues GalvãoComputer Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Rodrigo Oliveira Rosa Ribeiro de SouzaCardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital do Coração Anis Rassi, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn minimally invasive mitral valve repair, right minithoracotomy is the most widely performed method, providing a good view of the mitral valve. But regarding other techniques and although it offers limited visualization, the periareolar access is a less traumatic alternative. This study's purpose is to compare in-hospital outcomes in patients who underwent video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve repair via right minithoracotomy and periareolar access.

methodsThis is a retrospective observational study including 37 patients (> 18 years old), without previous right thoracic surgery, who underwent their primary mitral valve repair, with indication for minimally invasive video-assisted approach (via right minithoracotomy or periareolar access), between January 2018 and August 2019. Patients' medical records were consulted to collect demographics data, operative details, and in-hospital outcomes.

resultsTwenty-one patients underwent right minithoracotomy, and 16 were operated via periareolar access. The mean patients' age was 62±12 years in the right minithoracotomy group and 61±9 years in the periareolar access group (P=0.2). There are no significant differences in incision length, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time, hematocrit, amount of chest tube drainage, and intensive care unit and in-hospital length of stay. Time to extubation presented significant differences between the right minithoracotomy and the periareolar access group (4.85 hours vs. 5.62 hours, respectively) (P=0.04).

conclusionIn this study, we found similar results in the two applied surgical techniques, except for the time to extubation.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresMitral Valve InsufficiencyAdolescentAgedHospitalsHumansMiddle AgedMitral ValveRetrospective StudiesThoracotomyTreatment OutcomeAirway ExtubationCardiac Surgical ProceduresDrainageIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMitral ValveThoracic SurgeryThoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID35072396
PMCPMC8973132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.