Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072203›Full record

ArticleBiology open2022

Computational anatomy and geometric shape analysis enables analysis of complex craniofacial phenotypes in zebrafish.

Kelly M Diamond, Sara M Rolfe, Ronald Y Kwon, A Murat Maga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Loss ofJBMR plus · 2025
    Article
  4. Standardization of bone morphometry and mineral density assessments in zebrafish and other small laboratory fishes using X-ray radiography and micro-computed tomography.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  5. Loss ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly M DiamondCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8639-6795
Sara M RolfeCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-7774
Ronald Y KwonDepartment of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
A Murat MagaCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7921-9018
Seattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Identifying Osteoporosis Genes by Whole Genome Sequencing and Functional Validation in Zebra FishR01AR072199 · NIAMS · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI HSU, YI-HSIANG · 2017 to 2022
$3.2M
Diversity Supplement for Rohda YaseR01AR074417 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KWON, RONALD Y · 2020 to 2025
$2.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR072199NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074417NIH HHS AR074417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the complexity of fish skulls, previous attempts to classify craniofacial phenotypes have relied on qualitative features or sparce 2D landmarks. In this work we aim to identify previously unknown 3D craniofacial phenotypes with a semiautomated pipeline in adult zebrafish mutants. We first estimate a synthetic 'normative' zebrafish template using MicroCT scans from a sample pool of wild-type animals using the Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs). We apply a computational anatomy (CA) approach to quantify the phenotype of zebrafish with disruptions in bmp1a, a gene implicated in later skeletal development and whose human ortholog when disrupted is associated with Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Compared to controls, the bmp1a fish have larger otoliths, larger normalized centroid sizes, and exhibit shape differences concentrated around the operculum, anterior frontal, and posterior parietal bones. Moreover, bmp1a fish differ in the degree of asymmetry. Our CA approach offers a potential pipeline for high-throughput screening of complex fish craniofacial shape to discover novel phenotypes for which traditional landmarks are too sparce to detect. The current pipeline successfully identifies areas of variation in zebrafish mutants, which are an important model system for testing genome to phenome relationships in the study of development, evolution, and human diseases. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Indexed as

SkullZebrafishAnimalsHumansPhenotypeX-Ray MicrotomographyComputational anatomyCranial morphologyGeometric morphometricsOsteogenesis imperfecta

Identifiers

PMID35072203
PMCPMC8864294
OpenAlexW4206993370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.