Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072157›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2022

A randomized control trial of a multiplex gastrointestinal PCR panel versus usual testing to assess antibiotics use for patients with infectious diarrhea in the emergency department.

Andrew C Meltzer, Sophia Newton, Joel Lange, Nicole C Hall, Nataly Montano Vargas, Yihe Huang, Seamus Moran, Yan Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew C MeltzerDepartment of Emergency Medicine George Washington University (GWU) School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-8314
Sophia NewtonDepartment of Emergency Medicine George Washington University (GWU) School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Joel LangeDepartment of Emergency Medicine George Washington University (GWU) School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Nicole C HallDepartment of Emergency Medicine George Washington University (GWU) School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Nataly Montano VargasDepartment of Emergency Medicine George Washington University (GWU) School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4185-817X
Yihe HuangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics George Washington University (GWU) Milken Institute School of Public Health Washington District of Columbia USA.
Seamus MoranDepartment of Emergency Medicine George Washington University (GWU) School of Medicine & Health Sciences Washington District of Columbia USA.
Yan MaDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics George Washington University (GWU) Milken Institute School of Public Health Washington District of Columbia USA.
George Washington University · USMilken Institute · US

Funding

Data Driven Methods for Missing Data Imputation in Surgical Disparities ResearchR01MD013901 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MA, YAN · 2019 to 2022
$996k
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study analyzed physician treating behavior through the use of a multiplex gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI PCR) test compared with usual testing in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute infectious diarrhea to assess differences in antibiotic management.

methodsA prospective, single-center, randomized control trial was designed to investigate antibiotic use in ED patients with moderate to severe suspected infectious diarrhea, comparing those who received GI PCR to those who received usual testing. ED patients with signs of dehydration, inflammation, or persistent symptoms were randomized to either the experimental arm (GI PCR) or the control arm (usual testing or no testing).

resultsA total of 74 patients met study criteria and were randomized to either the experimental GI PCR arm (n = 38) or to the control arm (n = 36). Participants in the GI PCR arm received antibiotics in 87% of bacterial or protozoal diarrheal infections (13/15) whereas those in the control arm received antibiotics in 46% of bacterial or protozoal infections (6/13) (

conclusionsED use of multiplex GI PCR led to an increase in antibiotic use for bacterial and protozoal causes of infectious diarrhea compared to usual testing. This increase in antibiotics appears to be appropriate given patients' moderate to severe symptoms and a definitive identification of a likely bacterial or protozoal cause of symptoms. Results should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size.

Indexed as

Antibiotic Stewardshipdiagnostic testingemergency medicineinfectious diarrheaPCR testingPoint‐of care testing

Identifiers

PMID35072157
PMCPMC8760946
OpenAlexW4206274658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.