Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072092›Full record

ReviewArchives of academic emergency medicine2022

Incidence of Pediatric Perforated Appendicitis during the COVID-19 Pandemic; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gholamreza Motazedian, Poorya Aryanpoor, Ehsan Rahmanian, Samaneh Abiri, Navid Kalani, Naser Hatami, Farhad Bagherian, Mohammad Etezadpour, Roohie Farzaneh, Fatemeh Maleki and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Gholamreza MotazedianPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Poorya AryanpoorStudent Research Committee, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Ehsan RahmanianResearch center for social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Samaneh AbiriResearch center for social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Navid KalaniResearch center for social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Naser HatamiStudent Research Committee, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Farhad BagherianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Mohammad EtezadpourSurgery department, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Roohie FarzanehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Fatemeh MalekiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Mahdi ForoughianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mojtaba GhaediPlastic Surgery department, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Jahrom University of Medical Sciences · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRBabol University of Medical Sciences · IRBirjand University of Medical Sciences · IRJahrom University · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 has affected the pattern of referral to medical centers and quarantine against COVID-19 might delay referral and management of surgical emergencies. This study aimed to compare the pooled event rate of pediatric perforated appendicitis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThis was a systematic review and meta-analysis study based on the PRISMA guidelines. Scopus, Web of Sciences, and PubMed databases were searched for studies reporting the rate of perforated appendicitis based on the post-appendectomy observations or imaging methods. The Egger bias test and funnel plot were used to detect and depict publication bias. Statistical analysis was performed in Comprehensive Meta-analysis package version 3.

resultsTwelve studies were eligible for inclusion in our study. The pooled prevalence of pediatric perforated appendicitis in the pre-COVID era was 28.5% (CI95%: 28.3 to 28.7%) with a heterogeneity of 99%. In the COVID era, the event rate proportion was 39.4% (CI95%: 36.6 to 42.3%) with a heterogeneity of 99%. There was a significant difference in the subgroup analysis within the pre-COVID and COVID era (P<0.001), showing a higher perforation rate in the COVID era.

conclusionOur study showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the rate of perforated appendicitis has significantly increased in comparison to before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

AbdomenAcuteAppendicitisCOVID-19Ruptured

Identifiers

PMID35072092
PMCPMC8771157
OpenAlexW4200603688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.