Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072087›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2021

A Generative Modeling Approach to Calibrated Predictions: A Use Case on Menstrual Cycle Length Prediction.

Iñigo Urteaga, Kathy Li, Amanda Shea, Virginia J Vitzthum, Chris H Wiggins, Noémie Elhadad

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The messiness of the menstruator: assessing personas and functionalities of menstrual tracking apps.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Review
  4. A predictive model for next cycle start date that accounts for adherence in menstrual self-tracking.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Iñigo UrteagaDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Data Science Institute Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Kathy LiDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Data Science Institute Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Amanda SheaClue by BioWink, Adalbertstraße 7-8, 10999 Berlin, Germany.
Virginia J VitzthumKinsey Institute & Department of Anthropology Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Chris H WigginsDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Data Science Institute Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Noémie ElhadadDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Data Science Institute Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USSteinbeis University Berlin · DE

Funding

Core Research Computing FacilityG20RR030893 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PURDY, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2010
$10.0M
PhendoPHL:A Data-Science Enabled Personal Health Library to Manage EndometriosisR01LM013043 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ELHADAD, NOEMIE · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NCRR NIH HHS G20 RR030893NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explore how to quantify uncertainty when designing predictive models for healthcare to provide well-calibrated results. Uncertainty quantification and calibration are critical in medicine, as one must not only accommodate the variability of the underlying physiology, but adjust to the uncertain data collection and reporting process. This occurs not only on the context of electronic health records (i.e., the clinical documentation process), but on mobile health as well (i.e., user specific self-tracking patterns must be accounted for). In this work, we show that accurate uncertainty estimation is directly relevant to an important health application: the prediction of menstrual cycle length, based on self-tracked information. We take advantage of a flexible generative model that accommodates under-dispersed distributions via two degrees of freedom to fit the mean and variance of the observed cycle lengths. From a machine learning perspective, our work showcases how flexible generative models can not only provide state-of-the art predictive accuracy, but enable well-calibrated predictions. From a healthcare perspective, we demonstrate that with flexible generative models, not only can we accommodate the idiosyncrasies of mobile health data, but we can also adjust the predictive uncertainty to per-user cycle length patterns. We evaluate the proposed model in real-world cycle length data collected by one of the most popular menstrual trackers worldwide, and demonstrate how the proposed generative model provides accurate and well-calibrated cycle length predictions. Providing meaningful, less uncertain cycle length predictions is beneficial for menstrual health researchers, mobile health users and developers, as it may help design more usable mobile health solutions.

Identifiers

PMID35072087
PMCPMC8782440
OpenAlexW4207091397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.