Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072086›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2021

Hierarchical Information Criterion for Variable Abstraction.

Mark Mirtchouk, Bharat Srikishan, Samantha Kleinberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark MirtchoukComputer Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Bharat SrikishanComputer Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Samantha KleinbergComputer Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Stevens Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Harnessing Patient Generated Data to Find Causes and Effects of Diet in Pregnancy R01LM013308 · NLM · THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DEIERLEIN, ANDREA L, KLEINBERG, SAMANTHA · 2019 to 2022
$864k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large biomedical datasets can contain thousands of variables, creating challenges for machine learning tasks such as causal inference and prediction. Feature selection and ranking methods have been developed to reduce the number of variables and determine which are most important. However in many cases, such as in classification from diagnosis codes, ontologies, and controlled vocabularies, we must choose not only which variables to include but also at what level of granularity. ICD-9 codes, for example, are arranged in a hierarchy, and a user must decide at what level codes should be analyzed. Thus it is currently up to a researcher to decide whether to use any diagnosis of diabetes or whether to distinguish between specific forms, such as Type 2 diabetes with renal complications versus without mention of complications. Currently, there is no existing method that can automatically make this determination and methods for feature selection do not exploit this hierarchical information, which is found in other areas including nutrition (hierarchies of foods), and bioinformatics (hierarchical relationship of genes). To address this, we propose a novel Hierarchical Information Criterion (HIC) that builds on mutual information and allows fully automated abstraction of variables. Using HIC allows us to rank hierarchical features and select the ones with the highest score. We show that this significantly improves performance by an average AUROC of 0.053 over traditional feature selection methods and hand crafted features on two mortality prediction tasks using MIMIC-III ICU data. Our method also improves on the state of the art (Fu et al., 2019) with an AUROC increase from 0.819 to 0.887.

Identifiers

PMID35072086
PMCPMC8782429
OpenAlexW4207087185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.