ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2020
Comparing Machine Learning Techniques for Blood Glucose Forecasting Using Free-living and Patient Generated Data.
Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Blood Glucose Level Prediction in Type 1 Diabetes: Methods, Evaluation, and Emerging Advances.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A personalized federated learning-based glucose prediction algorithm for high-risk glycemic excursion regions in type 1 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Personalized Blood Glucose Forecasting From Limited CGM Data Using Incrementally Retrained LSTM.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Simulating Realistic Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Series By Data Augmentation.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Article
- Data-driven blood glucose level prediction in type 1 diabetes: a comprehensive comparative analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Long-Term Glucose Forecasting for Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: A Machine Learning Study with Real-World Variability Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting and Diagnosing Complications of Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Managing a chronic disease like Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is both challenging and time consuming, but new technologies that allow continuous measurement of glucose and delivery of insulin have led to significant improvements. The development of an artificial pancreas (AP), which algorithmically determines insulin dosing and delivers insulin in a fully automated way, may transform T1D care but it is not yet widely available. Patient-led alternatives, like the Open Artificial Pancreas (OpenAPS), are being used by hundreds of individuals and have also led to a dramatic increase in the availability of patient generated health data (PGHD). All APs require an accurate forecast of blood glucose (BG). While there have been efforts to develop better forecasts and apply new ML techniques like deep learning to this problem, methods are often tested on small controlled datasets that do not indicate how they may perform in reality - and the most advanced methods have not always outperformed the simplest. We introduce a rigorous comparison of BG forecasting using both a small controlled research dataset and large heterogeneous PGHD. Our comparison advances the state of the art in BG forecasting by providing insight into how methods may fare when moving beyond small controlled studies to real-world use.
Identifiers
35072085PMC8782424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.