Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072085›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2020

Comparing Machine Learning Techniques for Blood Glucose Forecasting Using Free-living and Patient Generated Data.

Hadia Hameed, Samantha Kleinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hadia HameedElectrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Samantha KleinbergComputer Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.

Funding

BIGDATA: Causal Inference in Large-Scale Time Series with Rare and Latent EventsR01LM011826 · NLM · THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KLEINBERG, SAMANTHA · 2013 to 2024
$3.3M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing a chronic disease like Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is both challenging and time consuming, but new technologies that allow continuous measurement of glucose and delivery of insulin have led to significant improvements. The development of an artificial pancreas (AP), which algorithmically determines insulin dosing and delivers insulin in a fully automated way, may transform T1D care but it is not yet widely available. Patient-led alternatives, like the Open Artificial Pancreas (OpenAPS), are being used by hundreds of individuals and have also led to a dramatic increase in the availability of patient generated health data (PGHD). All APs require an accurate forecast of blood glucose (BG). While there have been efforts to develop better forecasts and apply new ML techniques like deep learning to this problem, methods are often tested on small controlled datasets that do not indicate how they may perform in reality - and the most advanced methods have not always outperformed the simplest. We introduce a rigorous comparison of BG forecasting using both a small controlled research dataset and large heterogeneous PGHD. Our comparison advances the state of the art in BG forecasting by providing insight into how methods may fare when moving beyond small controlled studies to real-world use.

Identifiers

PMID35072085
PMCPMC8782424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.