Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072012›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

After short interbirth intervals, captive callitrichine monkeys have higher infant mortality.

Brett M Frye, Dakota E McCoy, Jennifer Kotler, Amanda Embury, Judith M Burkart, Monika Burns, Simon Eyre, Peter Galbusera, Jacqui Hooper, Arun Idoe and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Brett M FryeDepartment of Biology, Emory & Henry College, Emory, VA 24327, USA.
Dakota E McCoyDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Jennifer KotlerDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Amanda EmburyDepartment of Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Judith M BurkartDepartment of Anthropology, University of Zurich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Monika BurnsDivision of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Simon EyreWellington Zoo, Newtown, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.
Peter GalbuseraRoyal Zoological Society of Antwerp (RZSA), Antwerp, Belgium.
Jacqui HooperWellington Zoo, Newtown, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.
Arun IdoeApenheul Primate Park, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Agustín López GoyaFaunia-ParquesReunidos, Madrid, Spain.
Jennifer MickelbergZoo Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30315, USA.
Marcos Peromingo QuesadaFaunia-ParquesReunidos, Madrid, Spain.
Miranda StevensonBristol Zoo Gardens, Bristol, UK.
Sara SullivanChicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, USA.
Mark WarnekeChicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, USA.
Sheila WojciechowskiChicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, USA.
Dominic WormellDurrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Jersey, Channel Islands, UK.
David HaigDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Suzette D TardifSouthwest National Primate Research Center, San Antonio, TX 78245, USA.
Chicago Zoological Society · USHarvard University · USBristol Zoological SocietyDurrell Wildlife Conservation Trust · JEEmory and Henry College · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USRoyal Zoological Society of Antwerp · BETexas Biomedical Research Institute · USTheological University of Apeldoorn · NLUniversity of Zurich · CHZoo Atlanta · USZoos Victoria · AU

Funding

The Southwest National Primate Research Center Supplement- Infrastructure improvements of ABSL2 holding areasP51OD011133 · OD · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Larry S. Schlesinger · 2012 to 2026
$129.7M
NIH HHS P51 OD011133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life history theory predicts a trade-off between the quantity and quality of offspring. Short interbirth intervals-the time between successive births-may increase the quantity of offspring but harm offspring quality. In contrast, long interbirth intervals may bolster offspring quality while reducing overall reproductive output. Further research is needed to determine whether this relationship holds among primates, which have intensive parental investment. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we examined the effects of interbirth intervals (short, normal, or long) on infant survivorship using a large demographic dataset (n = 15,852) of captive callitrichine monkeys (marmosets, tamarins, and lion tamarins). In seven of the nine species studied, infants born after short interbirth intervals had significantly higher risks of mortality than infants born after longer interbirth intervals. These results suggest that reproduction in callitrichine primates may be limited by physiologic constraints, such that short birth spacing drives higher infant mortality.

Indexed as

Animal physiologyAnimalsBiological sciencesZoology

Identifiers

PMID35072012
PMCPMC8762461
OpenAlexW4205311562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.