Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35072000›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosafety and biosecurity2022

Assessment of biosafety implementation in clinical diagnostic laboratories in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Samreen Sarwar, Faheem Shahzad, Ayesha Vajeeha, Rimsha Munir, Amina Yaqoob, Aniqa Naeem, Mamoona Sattar, Sheereen Gull

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosafety and biosecurity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Samreen SarwarHealth Security Partners, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Faheem ShahzadDepartment of Immunology, University of Health Sciences Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Ayesha VajeehaCentre for Applied Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Rimsha MunirCancer Biology Lab, Institute of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of the Punjab, and Molecular Geneticist, Hormone Lab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Amina YaqoobCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Aniqa NaeemFood and Meal Science, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Mamoona SattarMicrobiological Engineering and Industrial Biotechnology Group, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai, China.
Sheereen GullSchool of Biological Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
University of the Punjab · PKDonghua University · CNKristianstad University · SEUniversity of Health Sciences Lahore · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory diagnostic capacity is crucial for an optimal national response to a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventing laboratory-acquired infections and the loss of critical human resources, especially during a public health emergency, requires laboratories to have a good biorisk management system in place. In this study, we aimed to evaluate laboratory biosafety and biosecurity in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this cross-sectional study, a self-rated anonymous questionnaire was distributed to laboratory professionals (LPs) working in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including laboratories performing polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based COVID-19 diagnostic testing in Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Gilgit-Baltistan provinces as well as Islamabad during March 2020 to April 2020. The questionnaire assessed knowledge and perceptions of LPs, resource availability, and commitment by top management in these laboratories. In total, 58.6% of LPs performing COVID-19 testing reported that their laboratory did not conduct a biorisk assessment before starting COVID-19 testing in their facility. Only 31% of LPs were aware that COVID-19 testing could be performed at a biosafety level 2 laboratory, as per the World Health Organization interim biosafety guidelines. A sufficiently high percentage of LPs did not feel confident in their ability to handle COVID-19 samples (32.8%), spills (43.1%), or other accidents (32.8%). These findings demonstrate the need for effective biosafety program implementation, proper training, and establishing competency assessment methods. These findings also suggested that identifying and addressing gaps in existing biorisk management systems through sustainable interventions and preparing LPs for surge capacity is crucial to better address public health emergencies.

Indexed as

BiosafetyCOVID-19 pandemicLaboratory professionals

Identifiers

PMID35072000
PMCPMC8768056
OpenAlexW4205373250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.