Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071993›Full record

ArticleACI open2021

The Cosmos Collaborative: A Vendor-Facilitated Electronic Health Record Data Aggregation Platform.

Yasir Tarabichi, Adam Frees, Steven Honeywell, Courtney Huang, Andrew M Naidech, Jason H Moore, David C Kaelber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACI open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Inpatient mortality following hip fracture in the United States: an updated analysis of over one million cases.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yasir TarabichiCenter for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Adam FreesEpic, Verona, Wisconsin, United States.
Steven HoneywellEpic, Verona, Wisconsin, United States.
Courtney HuangEpic, Verona, Wisconsin, United States.
Andrew M NaidechDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University. Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Jason H MooreInstitute for Biomedical Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
David C KaelberCenter for Clinical Informatics Research and Education, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLearning healthcare systems use routinely collected data to generate new evidence that informs future practice. While implementing an electronic health record (EHR) system can facilitate this goal for individual institutions, meaningfully aggregating data from multiple institutions can be more empowering. Cosmos is a cross-institution, single EHR vendor-facilitated data aggregation tool. This work aims to describe the initiative and illustrate its potential utility through several use cases.

methodsCosmos is designed to scale rapidly by leveraging preexisting agreements, clinical health information exchange networks, and data standards. Data are stored centrally as a limited dataset, but the customer facing query tool limits results to prevent patient reidentification.

resultsIn 2 years, Cosmos grew to contain EHR data of more than 60 million patients. We present practical examples illustrating how Cosmos could further efforts in chronic disease surveillance (asthma and obesity), syndromic surveillance (seasonal influenza and the 2019 novel coronavirus), immunization adherence and adverse event reporting (human papilloma virus and measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccination), and health services research (antibiotic usage for upper respiratory infection). DISCUSSION: A low barrier of entry for Cosmos allows for the rapid accumulation of multi-institutional and mostly de-duplicated EHR data to power research and quality improvement queries characteristic of learning healthcare systems. Limitations are being vendor-specific, an "all or none" contribution model, and the lack of control over queries run on an institution's healthcare data.

conclusionCosmos provides a model for within-vendor data standardization and aggregation and a steppingstone for broader intervendor interoperability.

Indexed as

collaborationdata aggregationelectronic health recordhealth information exchangeresearch network

Identifiers

PMID35071993
PMCPMC8775787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.