ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Sustained Reduction in Time to Data Entry in the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Registry.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing a Cystic Fibrosis Learning Network: Interventions to promote collaboration and data-driven improvement at scale.Learning health systems · 2023Article
- Transforming into a Learning Health System: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTimely data entry into patient registries is foundational to learning health systems such as the Cystic Fibrosis Learning Network. The US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) is an established registry that collects encounter data for clinical and research activities. Coordinators manually enter approximately 1,500 encounters annually at our institution, but there is limited evidence for interventions facilitating timely data entry. Our institution aimed to reduce the number of days between a clinical encounter and data entry into the CFFPR from an average of 43 days (range 0 to 183 days) to less than 30 days in a 3-month interval.
methodsData coordinators tested interventions to address barriers in four themes: accountability, work burden, communication, and visibility using plan-do-study-act cycles. We used statistical process control charts to assess progress on average time of entry. Coordinators provided feedback about acceptability and satisfaction for process changes.
resultsInitial interventions standardized process and reduced average time to data entry from 42.6 to 22.5 days in 3 months, but this process was not stable in the subsequent 6 months. Subsequent changes to increase metric visibility and improve team communication increased stability and decreased the average time to data entry to 23.0 days. Coordinators reported high satisfaction with process changes and have sustained improved time for over 2 years.
conclusionsThis quality improvement project reduced and maintained data entry time by addressing significant barriers without additional personnel. Increased access to near real-time data in CFFPR accelerates learning for clinical care, quality improvement, and research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.