ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Improving Adherence to Safe Sleep Guidelines for Hospitalized Infants at a Children's Hospital.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSudden unexpected infant deaths are a major problem nationally. We had poor adherence to safe sleep recommendations locally at our institution. Given the significance of this problem, hospital administration at a tertiary children's hospital tasked a multidisciplinary group of faculty and staff with improving sleep environments for hospitalized infants.
methodsOur safe sleep task force implemented targeted interventions using the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement as the gold standard and based on hospital data to address areas of greatest nonadherence to recommendations. We aimed to improve weekly average adherence to 95% over 12 months. A proportions process control chart (p-chart) tracked average weekly adherence over a 52-week time frame. In addition, we performed Student's t-testing to evaluate differences in adherence over time.
resultsThere was a significant improvement in overall adherence to safe sleep recommendations from baseline (M = 70.8%, SD 21.6) to end of study period (M = 94.7%, SD 10.0) [t(427) = -15.1,
conclusionsTargeted interventions using QI methodology led to significant increases in adherence to safe sleep guidelines. Notable improvements in behavior indicated significant changes in safe sleep culture. We also noted continued adherence in follow-up audits reflecting sustainability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.