Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071825›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology and global health

The impact of casirivimab-imdevimab antibody cocktail in patients amidst and post COVID 19 treatment: A retro-prospective comparative study in India.

Aneesh Puthiyedath Joy, Anitha Theresa Augustine, Mohammed Salim Karattuthodi, Jaffer Chalil Parambil, Dilip Chandrasekher, P Danisha, Linu Mohan Panakkal, Madhav A Joshi, K T Azharul Haque, Irshad K Mohammed Izudheen and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology and global health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aneesh Puthiyedath JoyDept. of General Medicine, KIMS Al Shifa Super-Specialty Hospital, India.
Anitha Theresa AugustineIMY 1, Aster, Wayanad, India.
Mohammed Salim KarattuthodiDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Jaffer Chalil ParambilDept. of General Medicine, KIMS Al Shifa Super-Specialty Hospital, India.
Dilip ChandrasekherDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
P DanishaDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Linu Mohan PanakkalDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Madhav A JoshiDept. of General Medicine, KIMS Al Shifa Super-Specialty Hospital, India.
K T Azharul HaqueDept. of Pulmonology, KIMS Al Shifa Super-Specialty Hospital, India.
Irshad K Mohammed IzudheenDept. of Pulmonology, KIMS Al Shifa Super-Specialty Hospital, India.
Shadia BadaruddeenDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Riya Sara JohnDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Sarath MuraliDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Ardhra Rose ThomasMedical Writer Intern, Ostum Global Medicomarketing, India.
Fathimath SahlaDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Shahir Ahmed Kv Ahmed UnniDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Raseel Omar AhmedHealthcare Data Analyst, Chisquare Labs, India.
Shinu CholamugathDept. of Pharmacy Practice, Al Shifa College of Pharmacy, India.
Al-Ameen College of Pharmacy · INAster Medcity · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonoclonal antibodies have gained attention in developing countries owing to its benefits portrayed by few clinical trials. However, no studies until now have been undergone in India.

methodsA retro-prospective comparative observational study was conducted in symptomatic COVID19 patients to evaluate the impact of Casirivimab and Imdevimab antibody cocktail in the high-risk population. Through an extensive data retrieval for 6 months, 152 samples were documented and sorted into test (Casirivimab and Imdevimab treated patients, n = 79) and control (Non- Casirivimab and Imdevimab treated individuals, n = 73) subsets. The research had two phases; first, estimation of mechanical ventilation and high flow oxygen requirement and mortality in samples amidst the treatment, and second was the post COVID19 patients' feedback through validated (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.7) questionnaire that evaluated their health and vaccination status, and treatment satisfaction.

resultsWe noticed lesser requisite for mechanical ventilation (6.3%; p < 0.001), high flow oxygen (5.1%; p < 0.001) and no death during Casirivimab and Imdevimab therapy. Meanwhile, non-vaccinated test groups were not on mechanical ventilation and those fully immunized seldom entailed high flow oxygen (test, 6.3%; control, 41.9%, p < 0.01). On evaluating the post COVID19 status of each patient in the study, 90.1% of the test samples were healthy and 97.2% were satisfied with the treatment than those in control group.

conclusionsCasirivimab and Imdevimab regimen was clinically beneficial for high risk COVID19 patients than those treated without the antibody cocktail.

Indexed as

CasirivimabCOVID19ImdevimabMonoclonal antibody cocktailMortalityPost-COVID patient Feedback

Identifiers

PMID35071825
PMCPMC8767937
OpenAlexW4205684609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.