Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071739›Full record

ArticleAAPS open2022

Development and validation of a headspace GC-MS method to evaluate the interconversion of impurities and the product quality of liquid hand sanitizers.

Nicolas Abrigo, Connie Ruzicka, Patrick Faustino, Neil Stiber, Agnes NguyenPho, Thomas O'Connor, Diaa Shakleya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Advancing ethanol content determination in hydrogels: non-destructive and operational methods for health and criminal inspections.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicolas AbrigoDivision of Product Quality Research, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Life Sciences Building 64, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA.
Connie RuzickaDivision of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 645 S Newstead Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
Patrick FaustinoDivision of Product Quality Research, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Life Sciences Building 64, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA.
Neil StiberDivision of Quality Intelligence II, Office of Quality Surveillance, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA.
Agnes NguyenPhoDivision of Quality Intelligence II, Office of Quality Surveillance, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA.
Thomas O'ConnorDivision of Product Quality Research, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Life Sciences Building 64, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA.
Diaa ShakleyaDivision of Product Quality Research, Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Life Sciences Building 64, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3649-0449
United States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased usage of hand sanitizer products by the public to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and decrease the likelihood of acquiring the disease. The increase in demand has also led to an increase in the number of manufacturers. This work describes the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) laboratories efforts to develop tests to assess the quality of hand sanitizer products containing ethanol or isopropanol as the primary active ingredient. The products were evaluated for the active ingredient content and determination of the 12 impurities listed in the FDA Hand Sanitizer Temporary Guidance, followed by a spike recovery assay performed to verify the test results. Extensive method development was conducted including an investigation into the stability of ethanol, isopropanol, and the 12 impurities. Stability and kinetic studies confirmed the instability of acetal in acidic liquid hand sanitizer products during spike recovery assay testing. The headspace GC-MS method was validated according to ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines and the spike recovery assay was validated using three concentrations of standards for the drug product. During method application, six liquid hand sanitizer products were tested and all were determined to have ethanol or isopropanol above 70% v/v. Two liquid hand sanitizer products were determined to contain acetaldehyde as an impurity above the FDA recommended safety levels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41120-021-00049-8.

Indexed as

Alcohol hand sanitizerCOVID-19Headspace GC-MSStabilityValidation

Identifiers

PMID35071739
PMCPMC8762429
OpenAlexW4206454493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.