Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071661›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022

Ideal Combination of Anatomic Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Positions for Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction.

Kyoung Ho Yoon, Yoon-Seok Kim, Jae-Young Park, Sang-Gyun Kim, Jong-Hwan Lee, Sun Hwan Choi, Sang Jin Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyoung Ho YoonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoon-Seok KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Armed Forces Hongcheon Hospital, Hongcheon, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Young ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Uijeongbu-si, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Gyun KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Hwan LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun Hwan ChoiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Jin KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital · KRNational Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is preferred over nonanatomic ACLR. However, there is no consensus on which point the tunnels should be positioned among the broad anatomic footprints. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To identify the ideal combination of tibial and femoral tunnel positions according to the femoral and tibial footprints of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) anterior cruciate ligament bundles. It was hypothesized that patients with anteromedially positioned tunnels would have better clinical scores, knee joint stability, and graft signal intensity on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) than those with posterolaterally positioned tunnels. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsA total of 119 patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACLR with a hamstring autograft from July 2013 to September 2018 were retrospectively investigated. Included were patients with clinical scores and knee joint stability test results at 2-year follow-up and postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography and 1-year postoperative MRI findings. The cohort was divided into 4 groups, named according to the bundle positions in the tibial and femoral tunnels: AM-AM (n = 33), AM-PL (n = 26), PL-AM (n = 29), and PL-PL (n = 31).

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences among the 4 groups in preoperative demographic data or postoperative clinical scores (Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores); knee joint stability (anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift tests and Telos stress radiographic measurement of the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation); graft signal intensity on follow-up MRI; or graft failure.

conclusionNo significant differences in clinical scores, knee joint stability, or graft signal intensity on follow-up MRI were identified between the patients with anteromedially and posterolaterally positioned tunnels.

Indexed as

ACLanatomyknee ligamentsmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35071661
PMCPMC8777344
OpenAlexW4206671166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.