ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021
Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Referral delays in metastatic breast cancer care: barriers and facilitators across a fragmented pathway.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- An updated framework for task shifting and sharing: refining the SHIFT-SHARE based on stakeholder feedback from India.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Navigating Complexity in Reflexive Cybernetics: Forces, feedback, and felt valences.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026Article
- Inclusion of antimicrobial resistance in a pandemic agreement: why it matters and what comes next?Health affairs scholar · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the participatory rural appraisal training-hands-on for medical (PRATHaM) students.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Training medical students in participatory rural appraisal methods using ADDIE framework.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- A process study of early achievements and challenges in countries engaged with the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health.International journal of mental health systems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAll policies and decisions need evidence examined by scientific methods. Moving toward evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) as a change in organizations, especially health systems (HSs), is inevitable. This study was conducted to identify the factors affecting EBDM in HSs from two approaches and to score them. MATERIALS AND
methodsA mixed-method study was carried out using the force field analysis regarding the change toward EBDM in HS in 2020. This study included six steps to identify and score the key driving forces (DFs) and restraining forces (RFs) to change toward the EBDM in HS: first, finding forces from literature; second, selecting key DFs and RFs through focus group discussion; third, scoring the first group of DFs and RFs by the experts through electronic forms; fourth, determining key DFs and RFs from the managers' perspective using qualitative interviews; fifth, scoring the second group of DFs and RFs by the experts; and sixth, comparison between forces resulted from two approaches.
resultsAccording to the literature and experts' opinions, "relevant, reliable, interpretable, and understandable evidence" and "interaction between researchers and decision-makers" were the strongest forces to change, and "lack of organizational commitment and support" and "lack of relevant/high-quality evidence" were the strongest forces against the change toward EBDM in HS. Further, based on managers' perspective and scores by the experts, "suitable supervision and control" and "reforming the planning and decision-making system" were the strongest forces to change, and "inadequate knowledge of the managers and staff about the principles and contents of EBDM" and "issues beyond the authorities of managers" were the strongest forces against the change toward EBDM in HS.
conclusionsBased on the findings, HSs' managers can focus to reduce RFs and promote DFs for implementing EBDM strategies, so they can provide better services by making more efficient decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.