ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021
Impact of two ergonomics training on prevalence of upper and lower extremity complaints among nurses.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) were known as one of the main occupational problems among health-care workers. However, we had some limitations and difficulties for transferring ergonomic concepts to the health-care workers, especially nurses due to heavy work task and insufficient time for that. This study compares the impacts of two ergonomic training methods (lecture and pamphlet) in nurses of an Iranian tertiary hospital on prevalence of their upper and lower extremity complaints. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn the present randomized clinical trial with parallel groups, 1140 nurses were randomly selected and allocated to the control and two interventional groups. In the interventional groups, nurses revived a training program and pamphlet as ergonomic training methods about work-related MSDs and related ergonomic concept to MSDs prevention and nurses in the control group, did not receive any ergonomic training methods. Upper and lower extremity complaints measure among study nurses with Nordic MSDs before 6 months and 1 year after trial intervention. Statistical analysis including the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit, Chi-square test, and independent sample
resultsAt the first and second parts of the study follow-up, the prevalence of upper and lower extremities significantly improved in the interventional groups in comparison with the control group. Moreover, between the two trial groups, the frequency of MSDs in upper and lower extremities significantly improved among nurses of the pamphlet group in comparison with the lecture group.
conclusionFindings of the study showed that we can use pamphlet as a suitable tool for describing ergonomic concepts in comparison with lecture among nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.