ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021
Performance analysis of data mining algorithms for diagnosing COVID-19.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning approach for unmet medical needs among middle-aged adults in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Towards Improved XAI-Based Epidemiological Research into the Next Potential Pandemic.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- COVID-19 infection inference with graph neural networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prediction of line heating deformation on sheet metal based on an ISSA-ELM model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Supervised Machine Learning Approach to COVID-19 Detection Based on Clinical Data.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn outbreak of atypical pneumonia termed COVID-19 has widely spread all over the world since the beginning of 2020. In this regard, designing a prediction system for the early detection of COVID-19 is a critical issue in mitigating virus spread. In this study, we have applied selected machine learning techniques to select the best predictive models based on their performance. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe data of 435 suspicious cases with COVID-19 which were recorded from the Imam Khomeini Hospital database between May 9, 2020 and December 20, 2020, have been taken into consideration. The Chi-square method was used to determine the most important features in diagnosing the COVID-19; eight selected data mining algorithms including multilayer perceptron (MLP), J-48, Bayesian Net (Bayes Net), logistic regression, K-star, random forest, Ada-boost, and sequential minimal optimization (SMO) were applied in data mining. Finally, the most appropriate diagnostic model for COVID-19 was obtained based on comparing the performance of the selected algorithms.
resultsAs the result of using the Chi-square method, 21 variables were identified as the most important diagnostic criteria in COVID-19. The results of evaluating the eight selected data mining algorithms showed that the J-48 with true-positive rate = 0.85, false-positive rate = 0.173, precision = 0.85, recall = 0.85, F-score = 0.85, Matthews Correlation Coefficient = 0.68, and area under the receiver operator characteristics = 0.68, respectively, had the higher performance than the other algorithms.
conclusionThe results of evaluating the performance criteria showed that the J-48 can be considered as a suitable computational prediction model for diagnosing COVID-19 disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.