ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2021
Machine learning approach to predict acute kidney injury after liver surgery.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Predicting Critical Postoperative Interventions: Proof-of-Concept Study Using the INSPIRE Dataset.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based model for identifying liver injury in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Radiogenomics and machine learning in hepatocellular carcinoma: from foundations to clinical translation.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Machine learning approaches toward an understanding of acute kidney injury: current trends and future directions.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning's role in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- Machine learning in liver surgery: Benefits and pitfalls.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Predicting the risk factors of diabetic ketoacidosis-associated acute kidney injury: A machine learning approach using XGBoost.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Machine learning for acute kidney injury: Changing the traditional disease prediction mode.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery appears to increase the risk of death in patients with liver cancer. In recent years, machine learning algorithms have been shown to offer higher discriminative efficiency than classical statistical analysis.
aimTo develop prediction models for AKI after liver cancer resection using machine learning techniques.
methodsWe screened a total of 2450 patients who had undergone primary hepatocellular carcinoma resection at Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai City, China, from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2020. The AKI definition used was consistent with the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. We included in our analysis preoperative data such as demographic characteristics, laboratory findings, comorbidities, and medication, as well as perioperative data such as duration of surgery. Computerized algorithms used for model development included logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), and decision tree (DT). Feature importance was also ranked according to its contribution to model development.
resultsAKI events occurred in 296 patients (12.1%) within 7 d after surgery. Among the original models based on machine learning techniques, the RF algorithm had optimal discrimination with an area under the curve value of 0.92, compared to 0.87 for XGBoost, 0.90 for DT, 0.90 for SVM, and 0.85 for LR. The RF algorithm also had the highest concordance-index (0.86) and the lowest Brier score (0.076). The variable that contributed the most in the RF algorithm was age, followed by cholesterol, and surgery time.
conclusionMachine learning algorithms are highly effective in discriminating patients at high risk of developing AKI. The successful application of machine learning models may help guide clinical decisions and help improve the long-term prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.