Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071556›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2021

Machine learning approach to predict acute kidney injury after liver surgery.

Jun-Feng Dong, Qiang Xue, Ting Chen, Yuan-Yu Zhao, Hong Fu, Wen-Yuan Guo, Jun-Song Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Machine learning in liver surgery: Benefits and pitfalls.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jun-Feng DongDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Qiang XueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200082, China.
Ting ChenDepartment of Intensive Rehabilitation, Zhabei Central Hospital, Shanghai 200070, China.
Yuan-Yu ZhaoDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Hong FuDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Wen-Yuan GuoDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Jun-Song JiDepartment of Organ Transplantation, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China. 974938677@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery appears to increase the risk of death in patients with liver cancer. In recent years, machine learning algorithms have been shown to offer higher discriminative efficiency than classical statistical analysis.

aimTo develop prediction models for AKI after liver cancer resection using machine learning techniques.

methodsWe screened a total of 2450 patients who had undergone primary hepatocellular carcinoma resection at Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai City, China, from January 1, 2015 to August 31, 2020. The AKI definition used was consistent with the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. We included in our analysis preoperative data such as demographic characteristics, laboratory findings, comorbidities, and medication, as well as perioperative data such as duration of surgery. Computerized algorithms used for model development included logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), and decision tree (DT). Feature importance was also ranked according to its contribution to model development.

resultsAKI events occurred in 296 patients (12.1%) within 7 d after surgery. Among the original models based on machine learning techniques, the RF algorithm had optimal discrimination with an area under the curve value of 0.92, compared to 0.87 for XGBoost, 0.90 for DT, 0.90 for SVM, and 0.85 for LR. The RF algorithm also had the highest concordance-index (0.86) and the lowest Brier score (0.076). The variable that contributed the most in the RF algorithm was age, followed by cholesterol, and surgery time.

conclusionMachine learning algorithms are highly effective in discriminating patients at high risk of developing AKI. The successful application of machine learning models may help guide clinical decisions and help improve the long-term prognosis of patients.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryLiver cancerMachine learningPredictionSurgery

Identifiers

PMID35071556
PMCPMC8717516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.