ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Benefits of multidisciplinary collaborative care team-based nursing services in treating pressure injury wounds in cerebral infarction patients.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of a chain management protocol in patients with chronic refractory wounds under the medical consortium model: a health-services intervention study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Article
- Roles, Barriers and Facilitators of Multidisciplinary Teams Supporting People With Stage 3 and 4 Pressure Injuries in Hospital and Home Settings: A Scoping Review.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Predicting Nutritional Risk in Elderly Patients With Community-Acquired Pressure Injury: A Noninvasive Model Integrating Age, Intake, BMI, and Braden Score.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary Collaborative Nursing Management Improves Health Behaviors and Psychological Status in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Heart Disease.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Innovative approaches to managing chronic multimorbidity: A multidisciplinary perspective.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of a Collaborative Multidisciplinary Care Model on the Efficiency of Emergency Care and Neurological Function and Prognosis of Comatose Patients With Emergency Cerebral Hemorrhage.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Clinical value of precise rehabilitation nursing in management of cerebral infarction.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Effect of graded nursing based on risk early warning concept on the incidence of pressure injury, quality of life, and negative affect of long-term bedridden patients.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral infarction patients need to be bedridden for long periods of time often resulting in pressure injuries, which may represent a serious threat to patients' life and health. An effective nursing program should be adopted for timely intervention in patients with pressure wounds.
aimTo explore the value of nursing services based on a multidisciplinary collaborative treatment team in patients with pressure injury wounds following cerebral infarction.
methodsPatients with cerebral infarction pressure injury wounds in our hospital from December 2016 to January 2021 were selected and divided into one study group and one control group based on the simple random number table method. The control group was treated with conventional nursing care (CNC), and the study group was treated with care services based on multidisciplinary collaborative care (MDCC). The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH), healing effect, Self-Perceived Burden Score (SPBS), and satisfaction with the intervention were calculated before and after 2 and 4 wk of intervention in both groups.
resultsSixty-two patients were enrolled, and 31 patients were assigned to each group. The results of the interventions were as follows: (1) There was no significant difference between the PUSH scores of the MDCC group (11.19 ± 2.46) and CNC group (12.01 ± 2.79) before the intervention (
conclusionInterventions for patients with cerebral infarction pressure wounds based on an MDCC treatment team can effectively reduce patients' self-perceived burden, improve pressure wound conditions, facilitate wound healing, and increase patient satisfaction with the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.