Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071491›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

A deep convolutional neural network-based method for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis.

Yurong He, Yingduan Cheng, Zhigang Huang, Wen Xu, Rong Hu, Liyu Cheng, Shizhi He, Changli Yue, Gang Qin, Yan Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sociodemographic reporting in videomics research: a review of practices in otolaryngology - head and neck surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Review
  13. Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgery.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yurong He *Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Yingduan Cheng *Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Zhigang HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Wen XuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Rong HuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Liyu ChengDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Shizhi HeDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Changli YueDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Gang QinDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qi ZhongDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is one of the most common tumors of the respiratory tract. Currently, the diagnosis of LSCC is mainly based on a laryngoscopy analysis and pathological findings. Deep-learning algorithms have been shown to provide accurate clinical diagnoses.

methodsWe developed a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model, and evaluated its application to narrow-band imaging (NBI) endoscopy and pathological diagnoses of LSCC at several hospitals. A total of 4,591 patients' laryngeal NBI scans (1,927 benign and 2,664 LSCC) were used to test and validate the model. Additionally, 3,458 pathological images (752 benign and 2,706 LSCC) of 1,228 patients' hematoxylin and eosin staining slides (318 benign and 910 LSCC) were used for the pathological diagnosis training and validation. The images were randomly divided into training, validation and testing images at the ratio of 70:15:15. An independent test cohort of LSCC NBI scans and pathological images from other institutions were also used.

resultsIn the NBI group, the areas under the curve of the validation, test, and independent test data sets were 0.966, 0.964, and 0.873, respectively, and those of the pathology group were 0.994, 0.981, and 0.982, respectively. Our method was highly accurate at diagnosing LSCC.

conclusionsIn this study, the CNN model performed well in the NBI and pathological diagnosis of LSCC. More accurate and faster diagnoses could be achieved with the assistance of this algorithm.

Indexed as

convolutional neural network (CNN)Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC)narrow-band imaging (NBI)pathology

Identifiers

PMID35071491
PMCPMC8756237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.