ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in preoperative and postoperative blood flow parameters are closely associated with in-stent stenosis after flow diverter treatment in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective cohort study.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Comparison of coiling followed by staged-flow diversion and flow diversion-assisted coiling for intracranial very large and giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Hemodynamics in Cerebral Aneurysms and Parent Arteries With Incompletely Expanded Flow Diverter Stents.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Coil embolization strategy after flow diverter deployment in patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection aneurysms: a study from a hemodynamic viewpoint.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Predicting postinterventional rupture of intracranial aneurysms using arteriography-derived radiomic features after pipeline embolization.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Global tendencies and frontier topics in hemodynamics research of intracranial aneurysms: a bibliometric analysis from 1999 to 2022.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Case report: Covered stent placement to treat delayed aneurysmal rupture after flow diverter-assisted coil embolization.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Delayed Aneurysmal Rupture following Flow Diverter Placement despite Adjunctive Coiling: Case Report.Case reports in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed aneurysm rupture after flow diverters (FDs) is a serious complication which mechanism remains unclear. The hemodynamics of FDs with proximal or distal densification implantation strategies have rarely been reported. In this study, we investigated not only the hemodynamic factors involved in postoperative rupture, but also the hemodynamic effects of different FDs implantation strategies on avoiding this complication.
methodsWe selected 2 internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms with similar morphological characteristics, both of which were treated with FDs but had opposite therapeutic outcomes (Case 1, ruptured after FD treatment; Case 2, recovered). The FDs strategies we designed were strategy A [with homogeneous 30% metal coverage ratio (MCR)], strategy B (with distal densification of 40% and proximal 30% MCR) and strategy C (with proximal densification of 40% and distal 30% MCR). Virtually FDs deployment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method were performed to simulate FDs implantation strategies and analyze the hemodynamics associated with postoperative rupture.
resultsAfter FDs implantation, the velocity of blood entering the aneurysm decreased (Case 1, 25.4%; Case 2, 30.6%), but the inflow jet impingement still existed in Case 1. The overall WSS decreased similarly in both cases, but the high WSS region hardly diminished in Case 1. For overall wall pressure, Case 2 decreased slightly but increased in Case 1. Of the three FDs implantation strategies, strategy C had the best hemodynamic effects, including the maximum blood velocity reduction and a tendency to form a more stable flow pattern, the maximum reduction rate of overall WSS and the effective diminish of high WSS area as well as the overall decrease of wall pressure.
conclusionsNot significant decrease of blood flow velocity entering the aneurysm adding persistent impact of inflow jet impingement, high WSS area that did not diminish and abnormal increase of pressure on the aneurysm wall may be causative of postoperative rupture and bleeding of ICA aneurysms. In addition, the hemodynamic effects were favorable when the FD was improved to proximal densification, which may reduce the risk of delayed aneurysm rupture following FDs treatment. KEYWORDS: Delayed rupture; flow diverter (FD); computational fluid dynamics (CFD); intracranial aneurysm (IAs); internal carotid artery (ICA).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.