ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Influence of deep learning image reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on coronary artery calcium quantification.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of image quality on low contrast media with deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in prospective ECG-triggering coronary CT angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Trial
- Deep learning image reconstruction optimizes coronary artery calcium quantification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of deep learning-based image reconstruction using TrueFidelity for coronary calcium scoring.PloS one · 2026Article
- Impact of Deep Learning-Based Image Conversion on Fully Automated Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Thin-Slice, Sharp-Kernel, Non-Gated, Low-Dose Chest CT Scans: A Multi-Center Study.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Practical application of heart modularization based on Personalized Patient Protocol Technology combined with Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technology in coronary angiography.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in coronary artery calcium score: rationale, different approaches, and outcomes.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Review
- A Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Improving Image Quality and Hepatic Lesion Detectability in Abdominal Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Quantitative analysis of small coronary artery calcium detectability with an accurate simulation and validation on a clinical CT scanner.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Impact of deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) on coronary artery calcium quantification.European radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) has been used for cardiac computed tomography imaging. However, DLIR and ASIR-V may influence the quantification of coronary artery calcification (CAC).
methodsCT images of 96 patients were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V 50%, and three levels of DLIR [low (L), medium (M), and high (H)]. Image noise and the Agatston, volume, and mass scores were compared between the reconstructions. Patients were stratified into six Agatston score-based risk categories and five CAC percentile risk categories adjusted by Agatston score, age, sex, and race. The number of patients who were switched to another risk stratification group when ASIR-V and DLIR were used was compared. Bland-Altman plots were used to present the agreement of Agatston scores between FBP and the different reconstruction techniques.
resultsCompared to that with FBP, image noise was significantly decreased with ASIR-V 50%, and DLIR-L, -M, and -H (all P<0.001). The Agatston, volume, and mass scores with ASIR-V 50% and DLIR-L, -M, and -H showed significant decreases in comparison to those calculated with FBP (all P<0.001). Severity classification showed no significant differences between the five reconstruction techniques in any of the CAC score-based risk categories (all P>0.05).
conclusionsDLIR and ASIR-V show great potential for improving CT image quality, and appear to have no pronounced impact on CAC quantification or Agatston score-based risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.