Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071420›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Influence of deep learning image reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on coronary artery calcium quantification.

Yiran Wang, Hefeng Zhan, Jiameng Hou, Xueyan Ma, Wenjie Wu, Jie Liu, Jianbo Gao, Ying Guo, Yonggao Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiran WangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hefeng ZhanDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiameng HouDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xueyan MaDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenjie WuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jianbo GaoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ying GuoGE Company, Beijing, China.
Yonggao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) has been used for cardiac computed tomography imaging. However, DLIR and ASIR-V may influence the quantification of coronary artery calcification (CAC).

methodsCT images of 96 patients were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V 50%, and three levels of DLIR [low (L), medium (M), and high (H)]. Image noise and the Agatston, volume, and mass scores were compared between the reconstructions. Patients were stratified into six Agatston score-based risk categories and five CAC percentile risk categories adjusted by Agatston score, age, sex, and race. The number of patients who were switched to another risk stratification group when ASIR-V and DLIR were used was compared. Bland-Altman plots were used to present the agreement of Agatston scores between FBP and the different reconstruction techniques.

resultsCompared to that with FBP, image noise was significantly decreased with ASIR-V 50%, and DLIR-L, -M, and -H (all P<0.001). The Agatston, volume, and mass scores with ASIR-V 50% and DLIR-L, -M, and -H showed significant decreases in comparison to those calculated with FBP (all P<0.001). Severity classification showed no significant differences between the five reconstruction techniques in any of the CAC score-based risk categories (all P>0.05).

conclusionsDLIR and ASIR-V show great potential for improving CT image quality, and appear to have no pronounced impact on CAC quantification or Agatston score-based risk stratification.

Indexed as

adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Vcalcium scoreCoronary artery diseasedeep learning image reconstruction (DLIR)risk stratification

Identifiers

PMID35071420
PMCPMC8743730
OpenAlexW4200449172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.