ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative Margin Control in Eyelid Tumor Surgery: Current Standards, Imaging Advances, and Emerging Techniques.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in the Surgical Treatment of Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ex-Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy for Margin Assessment in Basal Cell Carcinoma Excision.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2024Article
- Confocal Microscopy for Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Malignancies: Clinical Impacts and Innovation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Deep Learning on Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Ex Vivo Fluorescent Confocal Microscopy Data: A Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsA surgical incision through the center of a large basal cell carcinoma (BCC) affected area in the head and face region was performed. After removing half of the tumor, the wound margins of the remaining half as well as the corresponding skin surface were scanned with an
resultsAn overall sensitivity and specificity in detection of BCC in wound margins was 88.5%, and 91.7% compared to skin surface imaging and 97.8% and 90.7%, respectively, compared to histopathology. We identified all known confocal patterns of healthy skin and BCC in wound margin scans: damage of the epidermal layer above the lesion and cellular pleomorphism, elongated and monomorphic basaloid nuclei, nuclear polarization, an increased number of dilated blood vessels with high leukocyte traffic, inflammatory cells.
conclusionsThe accuracy of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.