Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Phenolic Compounds in Spray-Dried Olive Mill Wastewater.

Cinzia Benincasa, Massimiliano Pellegrino, Elvira Romano, Salvatore Claps, Carmelo Fallara, Enzo Perri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cinzia BenincasaCREA Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Rende, Italy.
Massimiliano PellegrinoCREA Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Rende, Italy.
Elvira RomanoCREA Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Rende, Italy.
Salvatore ClapsCREA Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Bella Muro, Italy.
Carmelo FallaraOlearia S.O.D., Mosciano Sant'Angelo, Italy.
Enzo PerriCREA Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Rende, Italy.
Research Centre for Olive Growing and Olive Oil Industry · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processing of olives for oil production generates the most abundant agro-industrial by-products in the Mediterranean area. The three-phase olive oil extraction process requires the addition of a large amount of water to the system, which is difficult to dispose of for its load of toxic pollutants. On the other hand, olive mill wastewater is a rich source of bioactive substances with various biological properties that can be used as ingredients in the food industry for obtaining functional and nutraceutical foods as well as in the pharmaceutical industry. In this study, we present the results relative to the phenolic compounds detected in dried olive mill wastewaters obtained using a spray dryer. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were obtained by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). In particular, the compounds here discussed are: apigenin (9.55 mg/kg dry weight), caffeic acid (2.89 mg/kg dry weight), catecol (6.12 mg/kg dry weight),

Indexed as

functional foodsmass spectrometryolive mill wastewaterphenolic compoundsspray drierzootechnical products

Identifiers

PMID35071293
PMCPMC8766512
OpenAlexW4205550108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.