Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35071020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

An 11-Gene Signature Based on Treatment Responsiveness Predicts Radiation Therapy Survival Benefit Among Breast Cancer Patients.

Junjie Shen, Derui Yan, Lu Bai, Ruirui Geng, Xulun Zhao, Huijun Li, Yongfei Dong, Jianping Cao, Zaixiang Tang, Song-Bai Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junjie ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Derui YanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Lu BaiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Ruirui GengDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xulun ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Huijun LiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yongfei DongDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jianping CaoSchool of Radiation Medicine and Protection and Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zaixiang TangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Song-Bai LiuSuzhou Key Laboratory of Medical Biotechnology, Suzhou Vocational Health College, Suzhou, China.
Soochow University · CNSuzhou Vocational Health College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe developed a strategy of building prognosis gene signature based on clinical treatment responsiveness to predict radiotherapy survival benefit in breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analyzed data came from the public database. PFS was used as an indicator of clinical treatment responsiveness. WGCNA was used to identify the most relevant modules to radiotherapy response. Based on the module genes, Cox regression model was used to build survival prognosis signature to distinguish the benefit group of radiotherapy. An external validation was also performed.

resultsIn the developed dataset, MEbrown module with 534 genes was identified by WGCNA, which was most correlated to the radiotherapy response of patients. A number of 11 hub genes were selected to build the survival prognosis signature. Patients that were divided into radio-sensitivity group and radio-resistant group based on the signature risk score had varied survival benefit. In developed dataset, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year AUC of the signature were 0.814 (CI95%: 0.742-0.905), 0.781 (CI95%: 0.682-0.880), and 0.762 (CI95%: 0.626-0.897), respectively. In validation dataset, the 3- and 5-year AUC of the signature were 0.706 (CI95%: 0.523-0.889) and 0.743 (CI95%: 0.595-0.891). The signature had higher predictive power than clinical factors alone and had more clinical prognosis efficiency. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that the identified genes were mainly enriched in immune-related processes. Further immune estimated analysis showed the difference in distribution of immune micro-environment between radio-sensitivity group and radio-resistant group.

conclusionsThe 11-gene signature may reflect differences in tumor immune micro-environment that underlie the differential response to radiation therapy and could guide clinical-decision making related to radiation in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

breast cancerLASSOprognosis gene signatureradio-sensitivityWGCNA

Identifiers

PMID35071020
PMCPMC8770413
OpenAlexW4205624672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.