Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35070897›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2021

The value of color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Danbo Zhao, Yi Jing, Xiaoyi Lin, Bixia Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danbo ZhaoUltrasonic Image Center, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Wenling, China.
Yi JingUltrasonic Image Center, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Wenling, China.
Xiaoyi LinUltrasonography Lab, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Bixia ZhangUltrasonic Image Center, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Wenling, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to analyze the value of color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

methodsWe searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on using color Doppler ultrasound, thyroid nodules, thyroid tumors, and Doppler ultrasound to diagnose the thyroid nodules. The outcome indicators in the articles had to include the numbers of true positives (TP), false positives (FP), false negatives (FN), and true negatives (TN). Subsequently, the Jadad tool was adopted to evaluate the quality of the included articles, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the experimental data.

resultsA total of eight suitable articles were selected. The results showed that the estimated sensitivity and specificity of color Doppler ultrasound for the diagnostic of thyroid nodules were 0.46-0.89 and 0.00-1.00, respectively. The pooled estimate of sensitivity for the different articles was 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.89], and the pooled estimate of specificity was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.00-1.00). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) was 0.917, which was larger than 0.9, signifying high diagnostic accuracy. This suggests that color doppler ultrasound can realize the clinical diagnosis of thyroid nodules. DISCUSSION: In summary, the results of this study could provide a clinical data for the promotion and application of color Doppler ultrasound in the clinical diagnosis of thyroid nodules, as well as further reliable data for follow-up clinical research on the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules.

Indexed as

Color Doppler ultrasounddiagnosis valuemeta-analysisthyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID35070897
PMCPMC8749106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.