ArticleGland surgery2021
Bibliometric analysis of research on thyroid ultrasonography.
Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The status and trends of type 2 diabetic osteoporosis research: a global bibliometric and visualization analysis over the past 20 years.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025Article
- A dynamic study of the postoperative management of thyroid cancer from 2003 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of robotic surgery research in breast cancer conducted between 2008 and 2022.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science from 2012 to 2021: Current situation, hot spots, and global trends of medullary thyroid carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of thyroid diseases has increased, which may be partly related to the widespread use of thyroid ultrasound resulting in a large number of asymptomatic thyroid nodules to be found. Research has found that many thyroid ultrasound examinations are completely avoidable. However, the purpose of the present study was to use bibliometrics to analyze the relevant research literature of thyroid ultrasound and understand the overall status of the current research in this field.
methodsWe searched the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) database in the Web of Science Core Collection. Search terms were "ultrasonography" and "thyroid gland". The date range for the document search was from 1900 to May 10, 2021. Export the full record of the search results and the references in txt. format, and use the CiteSpace software to analyze the annual publication of literatures, the distribution of countries and institutions where the literatures came from, the distribution of journals and authors. The keywords used in the literature were also analyzed.
resultsA total of 1,241 publications were included in the results, and the frequency of citations was 27,149. The top 5 countries for the number of publications published were the USA, Turkey, Italy, South Korea, and China; the top 5 countries by centrality were the USA, Germany, Italy, Canada, and China. The number of institution-published papers was generally low, and the centrality score was low. Research in this field was relatively scattered among institutions and cooperation between institutions was few. There was little collaboration between authors from different institutions. The most cited authors were mainly from European and North American countries. Journals, such as
conclusionsThere was an increase in thyroid ultrasound research, but there was few cooperation exist between institutions. The main research direction was the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.